this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34429 readers
69 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Dish Network (DISH.O) said on Wednesday its unit Boost Infinite had partnered with Amazon.com (AMZN.O) to sell postpaid wireless plans through the e-commerce platform in the United States.

The Boost Infinite Unlimited SIM kit will be available to Amazon Prime subscribers at $25 a month for unlimited talk, text and data services. Dish and Amazon did not disclose their financial arrangement.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adj16@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That’s…already the price for Boost Infinite, without any tie to Amazon membership. Ask me how I know.

[–] EeeDawg101@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yep clearly shows $25 on their website, weird. Probably a price hike coming if I had to guess.

Is boost any good? I’m on mint mobile paying $25 per month for 5GB of data. If I could get unlimited with boost, seems like a good move.

[–] pterencephalon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get cheaper on Mint because I get the 6 or 12 month price, but it means you have to have the money up front to pay for it.

[–] EeeDawg101@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yeah it def helps to pay for a lot of time up front on mint. I’m just a little leery about being locked in for a whole year but would be good to save more.

[–] pterencephalon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I did ak3 month first, then 6 month, then 12 month. If you do a family plan, I think you can also get the cheaper price with a shorter lock-in.

[–] adj16@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I left after 2 months. Their network has the same coverage as ATT & T-Mobile combined, which is awesome…
BUT
Their use of those towers is deprioritized. Which means all their requests get sent to the bottom of the queue. If there aren’t a lot of people around, no problem! If you live in a metro area, you wait so long to connect that it’s basically like you don’t have service. It worked great on road trips but was unusable for 90% of my use case.

I think a lot of the providers with discount prices do the same. A cursory internet search tells me Mint does too, but that they only use T-Mobile’s towers. So if you switch, your coverage might be better but your data connection times might be worse. Or maybe ATT just sees heavy use in my area, and you’d be fine.

I’m in Atlanta, fwiw. Not exactly inside midtown/downtown, but within the perimeter of 285, so still fairly close to city center.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No way do i trust dish to offer good service. I will stick with my T-Mobile Connect $15/mo plan thanks.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Boost Mobile is in a competition with Cricket to be the worst possible option for cell phone service.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know nothing about cricket since it runs on AT&T and AT&T hate almost any device that is unlocked. They make it nearly impossible to use an unlocked OEM device on their network. Verizon and T-Mobile are pretty good about letting you use whatever you want.

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean....i Just moved from Ting/Verizon to Crickett. It works fine. The primary line is a verizon line but the device is unlocked after 60 days per Verizons Policy.

The biggest annoyance with Crickett/ATT is

  1. ATT Passport Wifi cant be disabled permanently and is annoying

  2. Crickett constantly sends spammy SMS messages to me.

I may just move to ATT pay as you go for a bit more. Have dual sim verizon is borderline pointless from a data perspective. And t-mo has shit coverage where i need it.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What device? i know AT&T maintains a very strict whitelist and if you are not using Samsung, Pixel, or a device they sell your device is unlikely to be in the whitelist.

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh it’s an iPhone for sure.

But I also had a google pixel 4a with CalyxOS on it from time to time.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, see both of those are whitelisted. Try anything from Motorola or OnePlus and you will quickly find your phone unusable even if it supports the correct radio bands.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cricket also tries to charge you a bunch of fees to pay your fees. They're predatory towards poor people.

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don’t understand? They have flat rates. But will take 5 bucks off if you do autopay.

I did notice they charged my card even though I had a negative balance (aka a credit). Which is odd.

That said their onboarding process is ridiculous and confusing. Even for me. And they try real hard to charge you 9 dollars for an esim.

But the fees are included in my monthly service charge.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It has been years since I tried Cricket, but back then they wanted to charge $5 to pay your bill unless you did it a very particular way. I think it was either pay by check or enroll in auto pay. Plus they had fees for a bunch of other stuff. They charged me $5 on my bill once because I went to the store to ask questions about my bill. Maybe they're better now, but I would never try again to find out. Plus the actual service was awful. There were dead spots all over my city.

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah dont get me wrong. Theres a reason i moved to crickett but havent moved the rest of my family yet, though most of the savings come with multiple accounts.

Like I said i dont like their onboarding process, having to use a burner account/number to get started, then setup an actual account. I also dont really trust their security, specifically with porting and IMEI etc.

That said, their billing is pretty straight forward. Its x dollars a month (60 for my plan) and if you do autopay they will credit 5 bucks. Like I said though, i had a -65 dollar balance, so unsure why i was even charged, i had a credit. And their support is total dogshit. LIke call at noon on a tuesday and still wait 45 minutes through 4 queues to talk to someone that just wants you off the line.

But their billing is pretty straightforward.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess they switched it around. They used to quote one price and then bump that price by $5 when you went to pay it unless you agreed to auto pay. That rightfully pissed a bunch of people off, so now they quote the real price and then say it's a $5 discount to do auto pay. It's the same end result, but a pretty big difference in perspective for the customer.

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah definately. I ever did like the “get a discount for allowing us to auto debit you” thing.

I have a pretty solid credit provider now that will just reject charges if I ask within reason though.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because they deal with a lot of higher credit risk customers, or at least they used to. When I used them they were cheaper and didn't require a credit check. Everyone else required one, so everyone with bad credit went to Cricket. So they really want the authorization to just take the money they're owed. I tried them out because I liked the idea of a flat fee every month and nobody else was doing that at the time. But the customer service experience was so bad that I went back to TMobile after 2 months.

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 2 points 1 year ago

I mean I get that. I’ll be honest and say if service works so that I don’t have to call, I’m fine. Hell I have to deal with Comcast who has notoriously bad customer service. They are one of the few even now that will let you onboard with a gift card, essentially anonymously if you wanted. So there is that too.

My biggest complaint is the spam text messages and the att passport/boingo wifi thst I can’t tell my phone to not connect to. The latter may be a deal breaker.

load more comments
view more: next ›