this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
36 points (79.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35394 readers
1602 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

How did the Capitol Police stop the violent insurrection on Jan 6th?

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Wikipedia article for the attack has a pretty thorough summary of the events, most aspects of it are pretty well documented as far as I can tell. Essentially, the police were able to slow them down while congress members were evacuated to more secure areas. After a woman was shot breaking into a barricaded chamber door, much of the attack seemed to dissipate, and not long after further reinforcements were able to help clear the rest of the building. Trump then told his supporters to go home, knowing they had been routed.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you referring to insurrectionist Ashli "Traitor" Babbitt?

While some have attempted to turn her into a martyr the truth is she, and the others around her, were doing something very illegal. And if they had all been non-white individuals they would have met with far more persuasive force than a few capitol police officers as was demonstrated with the BLM marches.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's funny when supporters of the attack try to say that they were unfairly brutalized by police, like we didn't watch endless clips or witness directly people pummeled by the police for weeks for substantially less.

[–] potterpockets@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And that these are the same people with back the blue bumper stickers and blue line flags.

Oh wait i forgot that is only to show they support maintaining the status quo of systemic injustice and murder being carried out against minorities by people with qualified immunity.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fortunately, a lot of those insurrectionists were just along for the ride. It was a mindless mob with no real strategy or technique. Their numbers were enough that they could plow through barricades and trample officers, but they didn't have a goal. Sure, there were some people there who did have specific goals to accomplish, and those people used the mob to their advantage, but as a whole, it was just a LOT of people trying to get into someplace they shouldn't be.

Had each of them been armed with a single plan of action, we might be in a pretty scary place right now.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t forget one of the blue lines opened at least one barricade.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I know a conservative that believes those people didn't do anything wrong because at least one police officer guided them in.

[–] bigdog_00@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As do I, it is odd that he just guided them in though. At least, from the very grainy security footage he showed me a year ago

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A police officer is just as human as any of the other people there. It only takes one person on staff to be "sympathetic to the cause" and hope that if they won he would have been a hero to their side.

The whole point of their insurrection was to change the rules that he would then be enforcing. So it's pretty understandable that he would be ok with breaking the current rules if he would then be pardoned on the other side of the transition had they succeeded.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I agree, it annoys me that people act like this was a 9/11 scale attack on our government.

Was it bad? Yes. Do I disagree with their motivations and actions? Yes. Do I think they actually planned to actually overthrow anything? No. As shitty as it was it wasn't nearly as bad as it could have been. Imagine if even 1/10 of them had planned to bring/use rifles, molotovs etc.

If they wanted to throw down they would have, but they didn't, and I'm thankful for that. Same goes for the Capitol Police.

[–] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Their laughable incompetence and chaotic organization doesn’t change their intentions to stop the legitimate certification of the election. This was absolutely a massive attack on our Democratic system of governance. The fact that it was attempted by disorganized idiots doesn’t change that fact.

We got lucky.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Methodically and with difficulty.

There’s some good writeups that go into detail about the timeline and what different players were doing at different stages. The Capitol Police didn’t get the backup they needed when they needed it because of politics. Then suddenly the backup was made available when senator’s offices were being stormed.

[–] iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean... from what I saw ...they didn't really...