this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
137 points (100.0% liked)

News

22876 readers
3819 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected Oklahoma’s emergency appeal seeking to restore a $4.5 million grant for family planning services in an ongoing dispute over the state’s refusal to refer pregnant women to a nationwide hotline that provides information about abortion and other options.

The brief order did not detail the court’s reasoning, as is typical, but says three justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch — would have sided with Oklahoma.

Lower courts had ruled that the federal Health and Human Services Department’s decision to cut off Oklahoma from the funds did not violate federal law.

The case stems from a dispute over state abortion restrictions and federal grants provided under a family planning program known as Title X that has only grown more heated since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 and many Republican-led states outlawed abortion.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChlkDstTtr@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The brief order did not detail the court’s reasoning, as is typical, but says three justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch — would have sided with Oklahoma.

Of course those asshats did. They don’t care about the law or the constitution, just their feels.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

They don't even care about their feels. Because whether they agree with the party line or not, they always toe it.

I am absolutely not going to give any credit to Trump for picking Barrett, but at least she makes her own decisions.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

You beat me to it. Ghouls.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 40 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's a well trodden path at this point

GOP: I'm gonna do WHATEVER I want whenever I want up to and including KILL YOU AND FUCKIN CIVIL WAR if you try to stop me

Also GOP: Whoa whoa whoa, where's my entitlement thing you were supposed to give me, this isn't fair! More pls. Give more. I need it and you're supposed to give it to me.

It's like living with a teenager in the house who also for some reason has a handgun.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Clinics cannot use federal family planning money to pay for abortions, but they must offer information about abortion at the patient’s request, under the federal regulation at issue.

Okay, so women who ask about abortion must be given information about it. I assume, in Oklahoma, that information is "get out of state."

Oklahoma argues that it can’t comply with a requirement to provide abortion counseling and referrals because the state’s abortion ban makes it a crime for “any person to advise or procure an abortion for any woman.”

Seems like there's a super simple solution to this problem.

The administration said it offered an accommodation that would allow referrals to the national hotline, but the state rejected that as insufficient.

I assume that "rejected that as insufficient" means "gave the feds the bird"?

Oklahoma says it distributes the money to around 70 city and county health departments for family planning, infertility help and services for adolescents. For rural communities especially, the government-run health facilities can be “the only access points for critical preventative services for tens or even hundreds of miles,” Oklahoma said in its Supreme Court filing.

Again, seems like a super simple way to fix this, assuming, you know, that !OK actually wants to help its citizens, and isn't just granstanding for political points or something.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

They'll cut off their nose to spite the libs