this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
558 points (93.5% liked)

The Onion

4699 readers
485 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Political strategists are there to make party win even if it hurts the feelings of a minority, more news at 6

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Political strategists are there to make ~~party win~~ themselves money even if it hurts the feelings of a minority, more news at 6

So many of these consultants just exist to restate the bigotries and biases of the candidate, in hopes that they'll be hired on as Yes-Men in a doomed campaign. The GOP has been overplaying its hand on trans-politics since the Obama era. Candidates that run on this shit routinely get washed in all but the safest elections, because they sound like freaks when they run around town posting weird AI art with "IS THIS A WOMAN?!?! VOTE FOR ME!!!" next to it.

But because its become such a baked-in GOP strategy, we're now forced to treat "When can a mall cop grope your daughter's crotch to check if she's secretly a man?" as a serious campaign question.

Strategists don't care. They know their campaign is paid for by a bunch of bible-thumping neanderthals. So this kind of campaigning just won't stop. Because, paradoxically, the losing only makes people madder and more conspiracy-minded and more willing to throw good money after bad.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Campaign promises don't hurt any rights because they don't need to be kept, they're required to be elected.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArugulaZ@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

With friends like those, who needs enemas? (I know, Onion headline. Still, I'm sure there are plenty of people just like him all over the world. Try again ki- Moo hoo ha ha ha!)

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

It's not about being anti trans, it never was.

It's about being practical in the real world. Trans people rights are people rights are human rights, everyone should have the same rights.

However, Making this your primary issue will get you some voters but turn away more voters that you need to get elected. You can't help anyone if you don't get elected

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Most working-class voters I know are alienated by phrasing, but rarely by pro-LGBT positions alone. Trans rights are very viable for working-class support, you just have to find the right phrasing for it.

[–] Afterthought_C@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

These 'x issues are dividing the working class' lines is just trickle-down economics with race/ gender/ orientation etc.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›