this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
889 points (96.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12106 readers
2042 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neato@kbin.social 87 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Petty theft and similar crimes are almost always borne out of desperation. When you can't feed your family, have zero job prospects, or feel like the world won't allow you more than the barest subsistence, people turn to crime.

Vast majority of people aren't going to start mugging strangers when they are doing OK just because they want more. Personal risk of harm is just too great. Those types of thieves generally perpetrate white-collar and financial crimes.

Bottom left yellow person would be swayed if his initial motives were real. But the last motive shows yellow person is actually desperate, so while increasing guilt, is unlikely to fix the core issue and sway them.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

There are also people who are desperate because they're addicted to drugs, and safety net programs aren't gonna do much about that. Not really a counterargument, just a sidebar.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I would always see and hear about poor people having their homes broken into and things stolen and I was always like "Why don't you rob someone who's rich?"

Because rich people have better security. Which makes it harder. 😮‍💨

[–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Working as intended.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The rich probably live farther away than you do too. So the thief would have to make an investment in additional time as well as resources for travel. If you're a thief of opportunity, you likely don't have the cashflow to over that additional overhead.

[–] Veltoss@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The pro-theft communities are not going to like that bottom left panel.

[–] Slowy@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Are there pro-theft communities that support stealing directly from other (not super rich) individuals? I don’t think corporations are victims of the oppressive system, so stealing from them is still ethically congruent

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Small businesses can be such victims.

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seriously, the amount of people who assume that insurance will take care of everything is astonishing. Like have you never dealt with a insurance claim before? And not to mention the premium increases. Small businesses get fucked over by theft.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago

Which is why you almost never see them advocate theft from such places

[–] Slowy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That is a good example, thanks!

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

To be fair, if much of the money goes straight up the chain to corporate, then stealing is still hurting corporate's bottom line. It's just that it's also doing a lot of damage to the local branch, which could be hurting locals and creating food deserts.

(I'm not a theft advocate, btw.)

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's common in restaurants, but not so much in supermarkets. I think the biggest/most well known supermarket that franchises is sav a lot.

Safeway, Kroger, King Sooper etc are not and in fact own multiple brands. Kroger for instance owns not Only Kroger stores but Fred Meyer and King Soopers and a few others.

They're free for the pickings as far as I'm concerned along with Walmart, I might not steal myself but I'll be turning the other way rq if I see someone else doing it

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Franchising big supermarkets is totally unheard of in my country.

[–] 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're still shafting poor people when you steal stuff from local shops, even if they belong to large corporations. They usually start locking up items that are frequently stolen and sometimes even close down entirely. This is how food deserts are made.

[–] Slowy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think that’s the main problem contributing to food deserts. In my city, zoning regulations and anticompetitive contracts have created them… so, shitty business practices and nimbyism.

[–] 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's not the main problem by a long shot but it's certainly impacting existing businesses. For some of them it's just the final nail in the coffin.

Dumbass nimby boomers and zoning are a whole other can of worms. If you can spare the free time to annoy your city council with your pet peeves (which said boomer nimbys often can) you can get a lot of things done.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol. Good to delineate which crimes are activism

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is. It's how you get laws changed.

[–] Staccato@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's also how you destroy the environment of the Niger River Delta.

You want to take out the pumps, not the pipelines.

(Calm down NSA, I'm saying this purely in jest)

[–] applebusch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I get what you're saying, but there's practical considerations. There's just too many pumps for that to be feasible. Only a couple pipes though.

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

On the other hand, if you blow up all the pumps, it takes more resources to replace those than it would to simply repair a couple pipes.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

Why tf would you steal from a person when there's perfectly evil companies to steal from?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Chad Blue Furry vs the Virgin Yellow Furry

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That bottom left comic would actually play out with blue guy getting stabbed, and his wallet taken.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That bottom left comic would actually play out with blue guy getting stabbed, and his wallet taken.

By someone who had just said that they're engaging in crime specifically for the activism angle?

No offense, but I don't think you're qualified to know what would actually play out when one politically aware bipedal dog tries to mug another.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

No offense, but I don’t think you’re qualified to know what would actually play out when one politically aware bipedal dog tries to mug another.

Brand new sentence.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Touche, politically aware dogs aren't people. Lol

[–] javasux@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

blue guy getting stabbed, and his wallet taken

Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra

[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

His guts wide.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Blue would have been stabbed at “you’re a common criminal now”, probably.

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago