this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)

Games

20030 readers
550 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smallaubergine@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why do the British call it "redundancies". Seems like a weird way of saying we're laying people off

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Something that is redundant is not needed, it's a descriptive term. Layoff is a relatively recent US euphemism meaning relax or rest which became associated with non-working periods for seasonal work then evolved to cover redundancies. The US term is the weird one here.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They're both poor terms.

To me, "redundancy" means someone you don't need, as in, their job is worthless, and "layoff" means the company can't afford to keep everyone, so they're temporarily reducing the workforce. What we see so often isn't either of those, it's just headcount reduction or downsizing.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

In IT, redundancy can mean reserve, or back up; something extra in case something broke.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Redundant doesn't mean worthless. It means that you have a duplicate or something, or someone is already doing the job that you are doing. Your work still is worth something, it's just not needed anymore.

[–] smallaubergine@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Interesting! I see your point, appreciate it

[–] TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it implies the company is continuing on but that job is no longer a position at the company. Redundant or unnecessary as opposed to a position that they intend to fill again, as you would with a firing.

Lay off is weirder imo.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, layoffs feel temporary (like furloughed government employees). I dislike both terms though, I prefer "downsizing" or something like that to clearly indicate that it's not temporary and your job wasn't worthless, it's just that the company needs fewer people employed to meet budget targets.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I’ve been wondering what’s going on over there. Ghost Town Games have been radio silent about Overcooked for quite a bit now. I hope the issues are just limited to their publisher

[–] Seytoux@lemmy.one -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm confused, since I've already completed the game. What do you mean?

[–] Seytoux@lemmy.one -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Look for blasphemous 2 trailer in YouTube, it is in the making and should be released soon. Was announced more then a year ago I think.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

As I've said, I already played through Blasphemous 2, it was released a couple of weeks ago (August 24th).

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I'd be up for it! Though I hope they do some more grotesque bosses. They were the coolest parts of the first one, and the second one was a lot more tame for the bigger bosses.

[–] Seytoux@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh sorry, I misunderstood your comment and apparently totally missed the release.

Cool, as soon as I return to my home city I'll buy it. Thanks!

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

You're welcome, and have fun!