this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
34 points (97.2% liked)

Albuquerque, NM

167 readers
1 users here now

Rules

  1. Try not to do anything we need to make a rule about. It will be named after you.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20380296

Medina offered two puzzling excuses for leaving his camera off. He "cited intermittent conversations with his wife, who was a passenger in his unmarked patrol vehicle at the time of the collision," Ortiz says. "He claimed there was a right to privileged communication between spouses, which specifically exempted him from mandatory recording requirements." But the relevant policy "does not provide for nonrecording based on spousal privilege."

Even more troubling, Medina said he "purposefully did not record because he was invoking his 5th Amendment right not to self-incriminate." Since "he was involved in a traffic collision," he reasoned, he was "subject to 5th Amendment protections."

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago

This is the same dude that got himself a 100k police cruiser because he wrecked his.