[-] Steve@communick.news 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

We've never had a pair of candidates this unpopular. (Maybe Trump vs Clinton)
If the Dems had any kind of brains, they absolutely would pick someone else at the convention.
Just not Harris; She might be the only one, less popular than Biden is.

Trump has his evangelicals, they're a done deal. His others voters are a "tear down the system" vote. People who are tired of being fucked over, no matter who's in office. They see him as the "worse" things need to get, before they can get better; And they may be right.
If the Dems picked a genuine progressive, who offered several big radical changes (that we all know the ownership class hates), they would take a lot of votes from trump. They would win.

But I doubt they'd do it.
The only thing more scary to Dems than Trump, is a genuine progressive.

[-] Steve@communick.news 3 points 4 hours ago

Are you using the additional AVX12V 4pin power in the upper left?
I would bet the 5950x needs the extra power. The old CPU may not.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 2 days ago

That's a very capitalistic form of democracy. Candates need to pull themselves up by their boot straps.

While the Republicans promote socialistic politics, giving candates universal basic airtime.

I get it now.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 2 days ago

Here's all the changes.

Literally anyone could've been a contender. We don't know who they are, because the party never wanted to seriously entertain anyone other than Biden.

Contrast that with what the Republicans did. They had several debates with anyone who felt like giving it a shot. Trump decided he didn't need participate, and was right. The Democrats could have done similar but refused to.

Biden is too elderly. Trump is too many kinds of wrong. Most people know this. If the Democratic party figures out that Biden is almost the only candates weaker than trump, they'll be able to win.

[-] Steve@communick.news 5 points 2 days ago

Wait. I thought is was a federal tax system. Does it do state taxes also? I missed that.

[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 2 days ago

How can we know there were no strong candidates, when they don't get a real chance to run? They (and to be fair, most) simply assumed the incumbent was the best, because that's the way its been forever.

[-] Steve@communick.news 6 points 2 days ago

The party literally refused to hold any primary debates, or even primary elections in several states. They gave people no chance to even consider other candates.

[-] Steve@communick.news 48 points 2 days ago

Just be careful you're not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.

FPTP is absolutely the worst. Anything else is a massive improvement.

[-] Steve@communick.news 6 points 3 days ago

It doesn't usually much more than, "I'm not going to talk about that."
After repeating that a few times, when people ask or talk about something too personal, they'll give up.

[-] Steve@communick.news 13 points 3 days ago

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.

-Robert Frost

[-] Steve@communick.news 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We have a FlixBrewhouse in town.
You can get a real meal, great picture and sound.
Its the only theater I go to any more.
They show old movies as well as new. (Just saw Field of Dreams with my dad on Fathers day.)

The place is packed every weekend, no mater what's showing. You have to think past the screen, seats, and sound; You can make a great experience people will show up for.

[-] Steve@communick.news 20 points 4 days ago

If you're going to wait to fix climate change, until after you've replaced capitalism first. You might as well work on taraforming Mars and sending billions of people on rockets instead.

4
submitted 6 days ago by Steve@communick.news to c/abq@lemmy.world

Kagi AI Highlights:

  • The city council voted on several zoning changes, including allowing tribal representatives to comment on land developments near the Petroglyph National Monument, allowing drive-thrus in certain areas, and creating design standards for developments near the planned Rail Trail.
  • The ordinance allowing tribal representatives to comment on land developments near the Petroglyph National Monument passed unanimously, as it was seen as important to protect sacred tribal lands and cultural resources.
  • The proposal to allow drive-thrus in the Volcano Heights Urban Center was controversial, with the Planning Department and Environmental Planning Commission recommending against it, but it ultimately passed in a 6-3 vote.
  • An ordinance was passed to require development standards like landscape buffering and building design restrictions for properties next to the planned Rail Trail in downtown Albuquerque.
  • The council voted on several amendments to the Integrated Development Ordinance (IDO) Annual Update, including increasing alley lighting, allowing more duplexes, and adjusting fence/wall heights.
  • The amendment to allow duplexes in more residential areas failed in a 3-6 vote, while the amendment to require energy storage systems to meet neighborhood standards passed unanimously.
  • An amendment to have neighborhoods and developers meet after a development is proposed (rather than before) passed 5-4.
  • The amendment to allow tribal representatives to meet with developers about land-related applications passed unanimously.
  • The proposal to increase allowable front yard fence/wall heights to 5 feet failed 1-8.
  • The amendment to allow overnight shelters in certain zones also failed 3-6.
29
submitted 1 month ago by Steve@communick.news to c/abq@lemmy.world

Kagi AI Summary:
Albuquerque, New Mexico has been aggressively clearing homeless encampments, resulting in the loss of personal belongings for thousands of homeless individuals. The city has escalated these efforts despite a court order prohibiting the destruction of unattended possessions. Homeless residents have lost critical items like medication, identification, and survival gear, making it harder for them to find housing and jobs. The city claims it provides notice and resources, but advocates say this is rarely the case. Lawsuits have been filed challenging the city's actions as unconstitutional, but the issue remains unresolved as the city continues its encampment removal program at an accelerated pace.

9
submitted 5 months ago by Steve@communick.news to c/abq@lemmy.world

Kagi AI Summary

The New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness organizes an annual point-in-time count of the homeless population in Albuquerque. Last year's count found over 2,300 homeless individuals. Volunteers will canvass the city on Tuesday to survey unsheltered people and those in shelters. The count provides data required for federal funding and gives officials a sense of needs. However, it is acknowledged to be an imperfect undercount, as it depends on conditions and willingness to participate. Notably, the 2023 nationwide report found that New Mexico saw the largest increase in homelessness at 57% over the past year, along with high rates of unsheltered veterans and chronic homelessness.

4
submitted 5 months ago by Steve@communick.news to c/abq@lemmy.world

Kagi AI Summary:
The passage lists the addresses of various food establishments in Albuquerque, New Mexico that have recently been downgraded due to health code violations. Many issues were observed like rodent droppings throughout facilities, food debris built up under kitchen equipment, and employees not properly washing their hands. Major violations included lack of date labeling on food items, food stored at improper temperatures, and chlorine sanitizer buckets lacking test strips. Several restaurants had gaps in external doors and walls allowing pest entry. Overall, the list shows that many popular food locations were cited for health code violations and risks to customers if issues are not addressed properly.

3
submitted 6 months ago by Steve@communick.news to c/abq@lemmy.world

Kagi AI Summary:
The merger between PNM Resources and AVANGRID has been officially cancelled after three years of negotiations. While the $8.3 billion deal had overcome initial opposition, the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission ultimately rejected it in 2021 due to concerns raised by advocacy group New Energy Economy. AVANGRID appealed the decision but the court did not rule in time. With the deadline expired at the end of 2023, AVANGRID chose to withdraw from the merger. PNM had proposed extending the agreement until a court decision was made but AVANGRID declined. As a standalone company, PNM remains committed to transitioning to 100% renewable energy for its customers with or without AVANGRID's investment.

view more: next ›

Steve

joined 11 months ago