this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
130 points (97.8% liked)

Astronomy

4026 readers
326 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone that uses Starlink due to nothing else being in my area, I hate everything about this. Sure the convenience of having internet wherever I want is nice, but this still sucks. Especially since I'm a huge space nerd so this shit just hurts my soul.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In your defense, there should be internet in your area but the government dropped the ball and let Comcast scam them.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My favorite part is that bout 5 miles down the highway they have fibre optic. They've been "installing" it for about 4 or 5 years now. They've had the spool just sitting outside for half that time.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

God that's just depressing

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

5 miles is doable with a wirless link. it of course depends on other factors, like having visibility, but it is not impossible.

[–] PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s not the only problem with them, and potentially not the biggest either - there is no plan to remove or maintain them when they die other than de-orbiting them into the upper atmosphere. A recent study suggests that this will critically harm the ozone layer, and that adding metallic particles in the quantities implied by the number of starlink satellites that Elmo plans to launch could do far more damage to the ozone layer than our previous attempts to screw it up!

Article - https://www.sciencealert.com/satellites-like-starlink-could-pose-new-threat-to-our-healing-ozone-layer

Study - https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL109280

Yeah, aluminium oxide particles may be a problem. Some scientists are experimenting with replacing aluminium with wood. I wonder if this would be feasible on future Starlink sats.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

I can track them with a 16" Dob they're that common

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So after some time they all will come down und burn up, what time frame are we talking about?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The number of satellites in orbit around Earth is rapidly increasing, with some 100,000 expected to be in place by 2030. And as their numbers grow, so does the difficulty of observing the universe from Earth.

Starlink’s satellites are bright enough that astronomers have decried them as an existential threat for as long as SpaceX has been launching them into orbit. While the company has taken some measures to mitigate how shiny they appear from Earth, their increased number and the many other satellites being launched means that their light pollution is “threatening the entirety of ground-based astronomy in every wavelength and in different ways,” astronomers told the BBC. There is a fear that soon, space observation might begin to look like a “windshield of bugs,” and become unfeasible, a researcher at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory in Chile told The New York Times.

So basically, at least during the rest of this decade, our billion dollar telescopes, radio and optical, are blind on different frequencies or are only able to obtain diffuse resolution.