this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
131 points (95.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6625 readers
507 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tal 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is doable, given sufficient political will, though it'd be militarily pointless to go that far. Russia would fold long before that, or try playing nuclear hardball or something.

https://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2020/february/war-highest-defense-spending-measured

In 1943 and 1944, more than 40% of GDP was devoted to national defense.

US estimated GDP for 2024 is $28.781 trillion.

That'd be about $11.5 trillion/year for military spending, were things to reach WW2-comparable levels.

The EU estimated GDP is only up on WP for 2023, but that's $17.818 trillion. Add that to the UK's 2024 GDP of $3.495 trillion, Canada's estimated 2024 GDP of $2.242 trillion, Japan's estimated 2024 GDP of $4.110 trillion, Australia at $1.790 trillion, Turkey at $1.114 trillion, and Norway at $0.525 trillion, and you've got another $31.094 trillion in aggregate.

40% of that for military spending would be $12.438 trillion/year.

So at that kind of level, figure $24 trillion a year to work with as the aggregate of the US and all other listed countries.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven’t seen St Javelin in forever.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That’s not St Javelin. That’s not a Javelin. That’s a manpad, idk what bc I was an anti-tank dude not an anti-air dude.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 month ago

Just because you’re St Javelin doesn’t mean you can’t carry other weapons sometimes. St Bacon might occasionally want to eat an egg, stop pidgin holing people.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

We were going to spend it on drugs anyway

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 7 points 1 month ago

this shit is so ridiculous 😆

Send enough money to Ukraine to buy off all Russian soldiers.