AFAIK its some kind of insurance to prevent bankruptcy of finantial doom after having a legal case for child abuse.

Its one of the most fucked up distopian shit ever.

you can probably insure a church in case of civil suit, it probably has a really high premium

This is for churches, not specific ministers. Businesses are allowed to insure themselves against their employees committing crimes.

But the fact that abuse and molestation in the church is so common that this is something remotely entertained is absurd.

And let's be clear: the biggest risk for abuse is when a trusted individual has private ongoing access to a vulnerable person, and thinks they can get away with it.

Random performers in public are not trusted, parents are present and supervising. Priests, summer camp councilors, cops, politicians, and other family members are "trusted."

Random performers do not have ongoing access: they hardly know anyone's first names let alone their last name or where they live. They have an anonymous audience. The people mentioned above can and do have ongoing access.

People in positions of power can often find ways to get away with crimes. A performer in public, especially in the LGBT+ community, knows they'd be the scapegoat of anything going wrong especially in this climate and would be foolish to try anything.

Worry about the documented and ongoing abuses from powerful people (like, say, everyone who's ever met Epstein) and maybe look into whoever's wearing the Chuck E Cheese outfit (can't see their face, don't trust em) before worrying about well known marginalized people doing fun outreach story time in public with parents present.

I figured it out now - I missed 'MinistryInsured' - but this is the response that would've answered it for me, thanks :)

? I mean what's the caption referring to? "Drag queens don't have to deal with sex abuse insurance?"