this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32315 readers
791 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jlow@beehaw.org 15 points 1 month ago

"Labour", indeed.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago

Thatcher would be so proud

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago

Neoliberals have discovered salami tactics to destroy social welfare: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg-UqIIvang

[–] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate Labour. I don’t think anyone that voted for Labour voted for this.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

This is the miserable reality of the "lesser of two evils" of FPTP voting systems. This is supposed to be the "good" choice.

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

those contracts take years to tender and likely have huge clawback clauses. I doubt that Labour got into power and immediately signed contracts for things like this. More likely it was more expensive to stop it.

[–] mub@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Bingo. I also suspect they're gambling on it being a failure. Hard ball behaviour if true but a failure of such a privatisation would be very high profile and likely put a stop to anything similar for a long time.

Also note that failures to meet agreed standards will have penalties so it might be possible for labour to force them out that way.