this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22841 readers
214 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yeah, I know the one-dimensional spectrum is a fuk, don't be so ackshually.... if you HAD TO answer which would you say is more left?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blight@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

bro just keep adding dimensions to the political spectrum bro this time it’ll be perfect bro i swear bro just one more dimension bro

i don’t know what distributism is gigachad-hd

[–] Angel@hexbear.net 9 points 2 months ago

The political compass and its consequences have been a disaster for modern political discourse.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

They're both on the left cusp of fascism - distinction is irrelevant.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

Distributism has pretty much only ever been a Catholic deviationist thing so even though Social Democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism, at least it's moderate.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Socdems

(I mean if distributism implies diffuse ownership of industries a little bit by everybody, kinda like USA pensions, than it’s dogshit in that people can’t control their own place of production and if socdems implies sweden direction circa 60s-70s)