this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
1180 points (97.1% liked)

Memes

51594 readers
1582 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Fuck I wish imperial would just disappear. Metric is 100% better in every single way, bar none.

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As a European who grew up using only metric I like inches for crafting. It's a good scale for the things I craft and I prefer fractions over decimals when doing quick math or measurements.

But that doesn't mean metric shouldn't be the standard.

[–] Masimatutu@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I think we should all switch to base twelve and then measure everything in dozenal metric. All problems solved.

Edit: TGM by the Dozenal Society of Great Britain

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Masimatutu@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Above link stopped working for me so here's another: http://www.dozenalsociety.org.uk/apps/tgm.htm

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can we make it so?

Is lemmy big enough that we can rise awareness for a change? Or the other way around, can we use the rallying behind the metric system to make lemmy popular?

[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't think the majority of Americans have strong feelings about it one way or the other (despite what the internet may say). Honestly it's just so low on the list of priorities that it doesn't seem like we'll ever be in a stable enough place to care about tackling it. Hell we're still struggling to kill daylight savings time and that would require a fraction of the changes required to adopt metric.

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then we should start with daylight savings time.

The interesting question is if social networks can get stuff done without a stable enough place.

[–] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're trying, but the Sunshine Protection Act is stuck in congress. They're tying themselves in knots trying to figure out which time we should settle on. Like, I don't give a duck, just pick one and move on! Ask the farmers and other outdoor workers what they prefer, the rest of us can deal. They're concerned about traffic and whatever when we've seen that time changes cause lost productivity every single year. So infuriating, can't help but waste time on the simplest things.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 38 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I'm an American who designs PCBs in millimeters instead of thousandths of an inch. I'm doing my part.

[–] s_s@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Military, most manufacturing is metric only thing that's not metric are street signs, building trades and anything else the redcaps interact with daily.

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Except American aerospace.

[–] Chunk@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh my God I have a story about this.

Our entire company wants metric. The guidance folk want to do their modeling in metric. The prop team wants to do fluid/thermo in metric. The structures team wants to do load analysis in metric.

But the boys at the 'pad are imperial only. The water system, fuel tanks, all ground infra is in imperial. If someone runs down to the hardware store they can easily find a fitting, gasket, or o ring in imperial. But metric? Good luck.

So our company decided to support both. The flight computer and ground software did unit conversions, everything was unit-aware, telemetry was occasionally manually converted because the onscreen wasn't the right unit. We had written our own turing complete, inhouse programming language and we ended up implementing dual-static typing. We had float, int, bool and then we had units where some operations required the units to be the same thing. So cm and inch but not inch and kilogram.

The project was terribly mismanaged. To this day some still wonder why.

load more comments (2 replies)

After we lost that one expensive spacecraft we've been moving towards metric more and more there as well.

[–] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] Chunk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah but what if I don't have access to a ruler and I only have my feet?

Lmao checkmate euro

[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I think USA officially switched in the 70s?

it's in small text on all of your products.

The argument there would be mass confusion is really silly becuse the rest of the world switched and they did just fine.

Is the USA saying it's not as clever as THE REST OF THE WORLD?

[–] JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's just a pun. They're both units of mass, hence there would be mass confusion.

It doesn't work with the pun, but the more confusing part for people would probably be the fact that pounds are used for both mass and force, but in SI, the units are different (kilograms for mass vs newtons for force), though that doesn't really matter for most people.

[–] erev@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Pounds aren't used for mass. They're explicitly a measure of weight. It's just almost always in the context of earth's gravity so the approximation to mass can easily be made.

[–] JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

That's incorrect. They are, in engineering contexts, referred to as pounds mass (lbm) or pounds force (lbf) respectively. The US Customary Unit for mass is the pound (lb) (aka pound mass, lbm)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 0x2d@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

the imperial units should be the smaller text

[–] Misconduct@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

If the USA is OP then I guess so

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This would be better with one panel right?

[–] Random_user@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] EherVielleicht@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

ba dum tss.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

We'll just call your local coke dealer, duh.

[–] Zanz@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Pounds are a measure of weight (force) not mass like grams. Stone is the imperial measure of mass and slug is the standard unit (US unit). In metric Newtons would be equivalent to pounds.

[–] IWantToOwnTheSun@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

I came here to say this. A chunk of mass that "weighs" 100 grams is still 100 grams on the moon. A chunk of mass that weighs 1 pound does not weigh 1 pound on the moon.

[–] explore_broaden@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think in most common usage people use pounds as a measure of mass (convertible to kg). It’s why when you really mean force the abbreviation lbf (pound-force) exists, as opposed to the now more usual pound-mass.

[–] Zanz@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A pound at one gravity is equivalent to 2.2 kg at 1 gravity. Outside of aerospace there's not really a need to distinguish between mass and weight so it kind of gets used interchangeably.

It just bothers me when people complain about units and then use the wrong kind of unit.

[–] explore_broaden@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago

My point is that in common use a pound does refer to mass (not weight). For example the US Code defines that 1 pound = 0.453 592 37 kilogram. See also https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound_(mass).

[–] Gorvin@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's a bit weird that the US uses a measurement that was created in the time where people used their body parts for measurement.

Like, the inch is around the size of a thumb, and a foot could be bigger or smaller depending of who measured.

Still, it's still used as a measurement that only a small fraction of the world still uses.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

a bit weird that the US uses a measurement that was created in the time where people used their body parts for measurement.

Wdym?

What's so weird about my new monitor which is 7 penis in size?

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

😡

.

.

.

😞

[–] Xel@mujico.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Still, it's still used as a measurement that only a small fraction of the world still uses.

That's a lot of stills 🤔

But coming back to your point, yes, I have no idea why the US insists on keeping the imperial system, it's outdated, ugly and inconsistent. Plus you cannot easily convert from one unit to another.

[–] Gorvin@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry, english is my second language.

[–] Chunk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Your grammar is correct and your sentence structure is fine. It just lacks a bit of... pizzazz 😉

You could say

Regardless, it remains in use as a measurement that only a small fraction of the world continues to use.

Which maybe is a little bit too much pizzazz for Lemmy but you don't really get to have fun with your writing elsewhere!

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

To be fair, also in Europe imperial measurements are still used, for example in plumbing, where inches are used for some reasons still unknown, or in aviation, where they continue to measure, in part, in feet. In nautical matters it is a separate issue, measuring in knots and nautical miles, and has nothing to do with metric measurements either.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

The ICAO has apparently recommended using the international system of units since 2010, but it hasn't been widely adopted yet.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Civil_Aviation_Organization

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I see this meme beaten to death yet most people I know use the metric system, and my US based company and their nationwide conglomerates use the metric system too and have for over twenty years.

[–] potpie@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago

What amazes me is that we pretty much are converting, just very slowly, one thing at a time. In school we all learn the metric system, and it's used all over in industry and government. At the supermarket, everything is labeled in both systems, and some things have started trending towards metric as the default. We are all used to the 2L bottle size. The old fifth of a gallon bottle, though some still call it that, has been replaced by the 750ml bottle. More recently the 20oz bottle has been phased into the .5L, mainly--I'm sure--to shrink the amount while keeping prices the same, but still it's progress in this regard.

I think the transformation will be effectively complete when highway signs use kilometers. But I don't see that happening any time soon.

load more comments
view more: next ›