this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6294 readers
81 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I think it's just a bunch of literature graduates who are creating this hype around Shakespeare and sort of circlejerking and making it like a big thing so that their useless degree somehow remains relevant

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, like it or not Shakespeare has been a cultural juggernaut for 4 centuries. I'm not sure a bunch of literature students could manage that kind of outsized impact!

These are just some of the words he invented that are in common use:

accommodation

aerial

amazement

apostrophe

assassination

auspicious

baseless

bloody

bump

castigate

changeful

clangor

control (noun)

countless

courtship

critic

critical

dexterously

dishearten

dislocate

dwindle

eventful

exposure

fitful

frugal

generous

gloomy

gnarled

hurry

impartial

inauspicious

indistinguishable

invulnerable

lapse

laughable

lonely

majestic

misplaced

monumental

multitudinous

obscene

palmy

perusal

pious

premeditated

radiance

reliance

road

sanctimonious

seamy

sportive

submerge

suspicious

[–] CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow didn't know that - do you have a source for this?

Some words I can easily imagine replacing with synonyms, but how were people describing stuff like "exposure" or "suspicious" before Shakespeare, I'm dumbfounded :D

[–] chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, here's one source: https://www.shakespeare.org.uk/explore-shakespeare/shakespedia/shakespeares-words/. While it's not an academic paper, it's a registered charity, so I think it's probably a pretty reliable source

[–] CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Really interesting! Thanks!

[–] CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't agree with it but it's definitely an unpopular opinion :D

To some extent, it might be the case that he is a little overhyped - but I would argue any artist that is so popular, is in danger of being overhyped. I only read "Romeo and Juliet" and "Hamlet" from his work, and I can appreciate his workshop - it's really good stuff that survived for many years and remained valid.

But to each their own - art is meant to serve you - if you don't like it, move on and try something different. Definitely better way of going on about things rather than sticking to it, and pretending to like it in fear of being laughed at for a simple reason of sticking out of the crowd.

[–] Scotthomas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I agree his language can be impenetrable for modern audiences, remember it's just hundreds of years of evolving linguistic norms that have made it that way.

He wasn't trying to be haughty when he wrote (the uneducated folk loved his work).

But his grasp of story structure, pacing and tension was intuitive and near flawless. In multiple genres.

And yes, I have a writing degree, so I'm in the circlejerk.

Edited: Ok, I see it now. I'm a total tosser. Sorry