this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
825 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12106 readers
1541 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 64 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When people ask me why I don’t have children, this is why. I’ve yet to be beaten in combat.

[–] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Imagine a society where men withold sex until they are physically dominated, leading to women becoming more aggressive and violent as their biological clocks tick down until they reach a pinnacle of adeptness and take a mate, or form coalitions of less capable women to secure a mate at the cost of sharing.

If only we had the self control...

[–] ChamrsDeluxe@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Chainmail would not protect your from a flail. chainmail is really only protective against cutting/slashing. Chain does nothing for blunt force.

[–] Stamets@startrek.website 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] ChamrsDeluxe@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol. Sorry I do some medieval historical costuming and love medieval history. It's fascinating stuff.

[–] Stamets@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're good! I don't blame you. I know a very passing amount from playing DnD and a friend who's obsessed himself. He's got a youtube channel where he talks about fighting styles and re-creates fighting styles from videogames and movies. He'd have been embarrassed I made this mistake so let's just pretend it didn't happen...

[–] ChamrsDeluxe@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Lol, we could forget it happened, BUT there's nothing wrong with learning something new!

[–] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What would protect you against blunt force?

[–] ChamrsDeluxe@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Plate armor is your best bet. Padding helps, which was worn under chain. The padded garment worn under chainmail is called gambeson. Gambeson would help, but it wasn't close to perfect. Put on a dense, thick puffy coat and have someone hit you with a steel baseball bat as if they were trying to kill you. You'll feel it. Plate armor is the best choice. Obviously with enough blows from a hammer or mace and it could cave in and crush you, but that was rare. Best way to kill a knight in full plate was to get a few of your friends, pile on him, and put a dagger in the gaps of the armor. Throat, thighs, groin, anywhere there would be gaps in the armor.

[–] JeanTahra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Weren't war hammers specifically used to fight against plate?

[–] JeanTahra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

Pretty much yes. Blunt force is kinda the apex. No amount of personal protection protects you enough when the force hits. With plate you would disperse it to kinda spread it through the area of the plate itself and with padding you would divert force into deformations of the padding. But given enough force neither of them protects you.

That being said those protective options are still the best there are against blunt force and that would remain until the introduction of firearms.

[–] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your dad is right. A flail is an incredibly impractical weapon that's unsafe for the wielder. For close quarters unarmored combat, find yourself a woman who's handy with a dagger or smallsword. With the understanding that she's also proficient with a good polearm or bow for the fighting in the field.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I'm partial to women who are skilled with tonfa.

[–] BobbyNevada@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's wife material, right there.

[–] JoShmoe@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As well as ex-wife material.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Widow material if they don't practice safer sex.

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 12 points 11 months ago

the "10 years later" is the most accurate part

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Stamets@startrek.website 45 points 11 months ago

Well, the father says to the son to practice safe sex. Ten years later the son is in a sexual encounter that involves lethal weaponry being used, thereby making it inherently unsafe sex. The son says "I don't think my dad would approve" because he's referencing the safe sex conversation from childhood.