this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
93 points (97.0% liked)

Ukraine

8370 readers
411 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lisko@sopuli.xyz
doo@sh.itjust.works
Burstar@sopuli.xyz
93
Zelenskyy on global reaction to North Korean military in Russia: It's a zero (www.pravda.com.ua)
submitted 1 month ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

There might be a silver lining to a muted reaction here, if a third party can expect to send troops to support Ukraine and also face no backlash.

[–] Powerfromspace1@mstdn.social 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@Sunshine He is not wrong lots of talk 'concern' but no action. If Ukraine falls and Muscovy meatwaves come to Western Europes backyard within next ~ 10years we know who to blame πŸ’ͺπŸ½πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

10 years is two or three election cycles from now. Every government we have in western Europe is far too scared to do anything when they can just... Not.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What reaction is he expecting? Everyone has confirmed the troops are there. There really isn't anything economical anyone can do to North Korea that isn't already being done. And everyone is already sending money and weapons to Ukraine.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The US could start by allowing Ukraine to strike targets in Russia using US-provided long range weapons. That should have happened from the get-go. But it is something we can do today that would help.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden’s too chickenshit on that front to make any meaningful change to our policy there. Hopefully Harris will be better in that regard.

[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The US election is paralyzing the presidency from making any big moves until it's over. I think that's why the NK involvement was timed to start now, and also why Israel chose to start their genocide now. It's a good time to start bullshit and not be punished for it.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I thought I saw an article recently that said they could use the long range missiles. I might be mistaken though.

Honestly the entire "here's these weapons but you can't use them unless we say so" part of the war is crazy to me.