this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
333 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39004 readers
3260 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This will never work. YouTube is a part of education now.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Maybe that explains democracy falling apart everywhere

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are tons of highly educational YouTube channels, and traditional media has completely abandoned that kind of content. The average YouTube video has more educational content than "The Learning Channel." And you are more likely to get accurate information about history than "The History Channel"

This is a boomer take.

[–] isles@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What you say is true, but also ignores the alt-right pipelining that YouTube and others are seemingly complicit in, or at the very least is the result of perverse incentives.

And I'll say the exact same thing about TikTok. It's serving as primary sources for many problems around the world, it's giving more broad and informed, collegiate level discussions of the world, and it's full of brainrotting limbic hijacking. All true and I don't think any generation is fully equipped to deal it.

We can also see historically that banning a "vice" has never effectively removed the vice from society.

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Yes the acquiescence of all editorial and publishing decisions by these tech companies to "the algorithm" (which somehow absolves them of responsibility) is the main culprit there.

These platforms are more like radio infrastructure or TV infrastructure than any particular channel, and for the most part anything they specifically promote and fund doesn't tend to be that alt right content which is completely algorithm driven and ad/sponsor/dark money supported.

We need to employ nuance when discussing these platforms.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They said "a part of" not the sole providers of. Also there is tons of education content on YouTube. I have learned so much from YouTube. It's actually a really great place to go if you are looking to learn a new skill.

Maybe that hasn't been your experience with it but that's what I use it for the majority of the time.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I have learned a lot from YT, it's a really good plataform for that. Languages, programming electronics, and the list goes on... that was my YT experience during the 2010s. But there is also a lot of bs out there, maybe fuled by monetization, extreme groups or just because mankind is stupid at its core, that is purely aimed to diffuse nonsense, catch peoples attention or plainly influence people views.

Where I live, revisionism is teach at schools as if it is the real thing. "A part" sometimes is enough.

My comment was originally thought more as a joke than as a real complaint, but in all seriousness, YT has become an extremely good tool both to learn and to influence people. I understand that "regulating it" would be also another double edged sword, but something has to be done.

[–] skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My entire subscription feed is hundreds of edutainment channels pretty much. It's my alternative to the discovery/history/science channel for the modern age (and tbh it's higher quality too in many cases)

It's also really really good for learning practical skills like home repairs and automotive maintenance.

Some favorite channels:

Nilered

Styropyro

Practical engineering

Technology Connections

Breaking taps

The thought emporium

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Nanny State. Been saying it.

According to the 3 criteria mentioned in the article, YouTube wouldn't need to be banned, logging in to YouTube would be banned. YouTube is still functional (mostly) when logged out, and wouldn't violate those 3 criteria. The other services mentioned, like gaming, would be banned.

[–] Fleur_@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Not everyday I'm on the fuck you got mine side of the argument

[–] whithom@discuss.online 68 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does this mean a rise in single player and couch-coop games? 🤩

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Might I add: they also are finished day one with no massive 70gb patches to fix a slew of problems.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

... Yeah, about that.

The vast majority of the industry kind of... forgot... how to do that.

Also basically every big name single player game requires an online account to work.

I'd would not expect either of those things to change.

Maybe Australian kids can learn how to emulate retro games?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] philpo@feddit.org 46 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Of course one could also make the effort and instead force these platforms to provide actually useful parental supervision,guidance and parental information. But a blanked bann of course is far easier and much more catchy.

So the 14 year old that moved overseas/away can no longer legally play a game free for 6year and above in a private lobby. Neither can a 12 year old play with his divorced dad living out of state,even when they play a coop without any interaction with third parties.

All educational resources on YouTube? No longer available. Renowned youth programs from outside Australia? No longer available.

Even parents who let their kids use responsible to make sure they slowly adapt to social media are now criminalised. Getting your 13 year old a Facebook accounts have full control of so it can be member in two closed groups (local clubs) and chat with relatives? Nope,not possible.

Technically even using WhatsApp or Matrix can fall under this ban,btw.

Because it's wording is so bad.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)
  1. The sole or primary purpose of the service is to enable online social interaction between two or more end users;
  2. The service allows end users to link to, or interact with, some or all of the other end users;

The first two rules basically just mean no one can interact. A version of YouTube could exist within these rules.

  1. The service allows end users to post material on the service.

So that's basically the Internet. You can't visit Rotten Tomatoes for film reviews. Maybe you only show the critics score. But aren't they also end users? How about a newspaper? Newspaper has an opinion section. How many opinion writers can you have?

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

All children must now be locked alone in a windowless room and fed via robot until the age of 16 for their own safety. ~/s if that isn't obvious. But seriously I thought US conservitives were draconian.~

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 7 points 2 days ago
[–] tourist@lemmy.world 57 points 3 days ago (23 children)

are you under 16

no

ok cool here's a youtube short when an AI voice tells you an AI-written story over vaguely related stock footage

The planet is fucking melting and elected leaders are writing laws on herding cats

I've been using the internet for longer than I've been an adult.

I still sometimes add +10 years to date of birth fields out of habit.

Might as well have issued a mandate to nom a spoonful of sand daily.

[–] 100@fedia.io 15 points 3 days ago (12 children)

easy to just always set your birthdate as jan 1900 or 1950

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To the "can't enforce this because it can be circumvented" argument - this is missing the point of most laws. The intention is to apply to the majority, not to be foolproof. Getting most to stop a harmful behavior already gets us most of the benefits. We can never stop everyone.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok, and how will it be enforced at all?

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Hopefully it'll just be a "Are you over 16?" box.

Digital ID sounds fucking disastrous.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

And that is the thinly veiled real goal here. If you need a proper age verification process on most platforms, you need an identification process on most platforms. And that conveniently allows to associate everything you do on every platform to you personally. So if the government doesn't like what you do, they can oppress you more easily.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It'll be more than a question. But again, how will Australia enforce that? Even if Australia provided a free API for age checks, it would still be a hassle to implement it. Are eg Fediverse devs going to do that?

Australian law enforcement can seize servers that are physically in Australia. It can also cut off cash flow for any business with paying customers in Australia. And all the rest? Even aside from free VPNs, there is a lot of internet that they can't touch.

They can lean on the likes of Youtube or Facebook to steer people in a more government approved direction. But as soon as people become annoyed or bored, they just go elsewhere beyond government control. If ID requirements are onerous for ordinary people, they will avoid compliant sites from the start.

The government could make Australian ISPs use a blacklist or a whitelist. Serious enforcement is possible, but not without going full totalitarian.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The US in 6 months: "fuckin watch me."

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Back to LAN parties? Because those were pretty fun to be honest...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Dogs_cant_look_up@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

This kills the crab.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (14 children)

watch this space, australia is the testing ground for new services overseas. If this rolls out effectively in Australia, you can expect it in your own country soon.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›