this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
574 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59392 readers
3274 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

One of my biggest issues with the ads is that they're mostly scams. I just get ads for shit I know isn't real

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 129 points 3 days ago (10 children)

u/Dangerous-Pizza7054 from the article,

Seems like the user tracking "special promotion" overrides the premium. They don't even say whether it's expected or not. But my take away is that paying for premium may or may not show you ads, but you are definitely tracked and harvested for data. (Maybe even more so, since, well, you are more valuable to them.)

[–] mlen@awful.systems 34 points 3 days ago

ublock is cheaper and actually works

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So premium users put their data on a pedestal for Google? That's fun

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago

That's generally; if you have an account, you are easier to track for them.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

That has been my specific issue with paying for any Google product always. I understand when I am using a product for free that I am not necessarily the customer and that money has to be made off of me or the users more generally somehow. That's "fine" (ish, not really, but that has more to do with issues of security than anything).

However when I pay for a product or service, I want to now be the customer and I want to be in control of my data and have the company cater to me. If, when paying for a Google service, there was some legally relevant things in place that insured I was no longer being tracked and used to generate revenue via third parties I would gladly pay. Probably more than they are charging now, but instead they want to have it both ways which is just not OK with me.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Well yes, you didn't get first ads. But what about second ads?

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

I got the same Sunday banner in the middle of the screen similar to where shorts show up. Never in my life have I watched or cared for American football. Clearly a waste of money for the advertising company since I just closed it by pressing the x same as shorts on desktop.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 44 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'd bet that channel "members" don't get ads for that channel regardless of premium status.

IMO, Google made premium, almost nobody bought it. So they went after adblockers, hoping that people would get premium to get rid of the ads. People most just Adblock harder.

While this is happening, one exec is peering over the fence at twitch. Where they only way to get away from ads without a pretty good Adblock, is to subscribe to the individual creator.

So they make "memberships" to channels a thing.

Almost nobody buys that either. So they go... What if, even if someone is premium, we give them ads, unless they're a channel member.

Genius.

Paying to block ads per creator/channel/whatever, is a special level of bullshit that twitch has always had.

The system is working as expected. The companies are trying to find the best way to extract the most value from you using their platform.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People are buying memberships though?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is all conjecture right?

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

Indeed. I have absolutely no way of knowing anything for certain.

I'm just screaming into the void from this hellscape we call Earth.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 158 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If this goes live, I'm out. YT premium is my most expensive subscription, but I watch enough YouTube that I'm OK with it, especially considering that it supports creators more than ad viewers. If I still get ads? Nah dawg. I'll divy up that money amongst patreons or whatever, and install add blockers.

[–] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (18 children)

If your main reason for paying premium is for ad blocking, I’d suggest just cancelling it now and using ad blockers. If you want to support creators, I’d say that it’s better to cancel and subscribe to a few patreons - I’d pick some of the smaller creators you like, to spread some of that support around a bit.

If you use iOS devices for watching YouTube, look into side-loading uYou+, it’s basically an edited YouTube app that removes most of the ads. You can stream from your phone to the apple TV, too, also without ads.

Not sure what the android equivalent is, but someone else will know - hopefully they will share in the comments also.

[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

You're suggesting turning a $15 or so YouTube bill into a $50+ Patreon bill depending on what creators they watch

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Why don’t you just cancel it now and use ad blockers?

Joel explains this in the second sentence: "I’m OK with it, especially considering that it supports creators more than ad viewers"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sprucie@feddit.uk 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ReVanced is great on Android, it also enables other YouTube premium features such as picture-in-picure mode.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] scripthook@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I use New Pipe for android and Freetube for desktop. I have all the YouTube premium features at $0 cost and no ads hehe

I use revanced, it's good

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't been able to use new pipe since a few months back, did they fix it?

[–] enix@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

My NewPipe hasn't broken for a significant time in quite a while, it's good to go in my experience

[–] 299792458ms@lemmy.zip 144 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I guess they are premium ads?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 77 points 3 days ago (2 children)

this but unironically

advertisers paid a premium

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ad companies have the new subscription tier of Premium Buster, so now you have to upgrade to Premium Buster Buster

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I love seeing a Big Hit reference. Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one who's ever seen that movie.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The second i see an ad in cancelling my subscription

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You do see ads, you just don't realize it. There are multiple 1-2 minute videos on your feed usually with the title "Introducing [insert product]" and these are product placements that YouTube is very well aware of. They also had the audacity to tell me that these are ads but they don't "interfere" with me watching videos. So, they are injecting ads into premium subscriber feeds already. Disgusting company.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's true.

I can skip those at least. And do with sponsorblock

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 63 points 3 days ago (7 children)

What ads? (User without premium, but proper browser and adblocker)

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Firebox mobile + unlock origin extension + YouTube.com.

You get everything that YouTube premium can offer. Including screen off play.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

personaldnsfilter + the Youtube app. Fuck ads.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Don't worry, simply pay for Youtube Premium+ to get rid of ads on Premium!

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hi, would you like to try Youtube Premium PLATINUM for only another $2.99? It's EVEN MORE ad-free! We mean it!

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Youtube Premium plus Ultra!

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago
[–] lychee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

whos gonna prosecute any of this shit now

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 28 points 3 days ago

Oh they will prosecute! They will prosecute people with adblocks and alternative clients.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is why I stopped paying them. Fuck them, you're just an source of income to them.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean, yeah, what kind of relationship did you expect?
They're not running youtube for the good of their heart

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Lol godamnit I just found out YouTube is a business, you're getting downvoted!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YogurtDoes@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Yeah I stopped paying for premium once I’d figured out using Safari on my phone with an ad blocker works with YouTube still lol

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 days ago

I use Firefox with ublock on my phone and I get no ads. Or I watch them in Newpipe.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 days ago

It is just YT testing new exciting features, nothing to worry about.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 7 points 3 days ago

Suckers paying for it

load more comments
view more: next ›