this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
29 points (93.9% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
544 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Seems straightforward to me. It's pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It's also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.

[–] TheMcG@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

Exactly what I was thinking. This just sounds like it would be a victim impact statement which serves very standard.

I also fail to see how it could possibly be considered irrelevant.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

But your honour it would be devastating to our case!

[–] baconisaveg@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

I think it would depend on what they're trying to charge him with.

[–] 44razorsedge@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Clowvnoy organizers fucked around and now don't want to find out. FTFY

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

I love when people who apparently work as writers get stuff like if/whether wrong.

Okay, I don't: they should know better.

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

lock them up!