corsicanguppy

It may not meet the dictionary definition but I’ve considered moonlighting working an extra job, without necessarily telling your boss, but outside of regular work hours.

But that's kinda it: the act of working at an extra job, especially without telling your main employer

In my case, I tell my hiring manager when I sign the hiring doc: "I've been moonlighting for 22 years. It's as-available contract night work, and it's always more lucrative than OT or standby so I'll decline where possible. You won't notice, but I'm mentioning it up-front."

And then I sign. If I need to cross out some weird "we also own your free time" clause, I will do so and call it out as such.

The comic is blurry.

Can confirm. I have a Rupert J Farnsworth III name, and no one calls me that.

My background check and extra check and mili check and squirrell check and all that? Steve Guppy aka Rupert J Farnsworth III is cool.

My bank readily accepts cheques addressed to my preferred name. Our IRS emulant has all that stuff. It was only 2 years ago my new employer mandated deadnames and it's been a constant struggle to bring their Plano/Delhi asses into line with anything modern. People say "Rupert! Bwahahaha" when it pops up.

And I know a guy in Florida who doesn't fit the FloridaMan tag, but here we are.

I forgot about the sunflowers. Excellent.

this type of brain damage is on a spectrum

This paper estimates that 4.5% of the population is psychopathic

Has psychopatic traits*

Also known as "on a spectrum" ...right?

I don't understand why, but they dont account for sociopathy at all in that study.

Not in the DSM as such maybe?

That fits with his preference for the truth to come out.

But will Epstein make a difference here any more than winning court cases did to restore Spacey's image?

They should be held in contempt until they wish to identify themselves for the permanent record.

Bailiff, take them to their shared accommodations.

Ask about retention and privacy policies: who can access them, and how can we confirm that? How often will that access policy be reviewed? Which primary and secondary person is responsible for confirming access and access lists? The risk of lawsuits could require insurance;nor will the contingency fund be paying for lawsuits brought by privacy violations that could arrive a decade after a violation? Where are the recordings stored, and for how long? Which member and secondary is responsible for reporting the status and size of held recordings, confirm they're being rotated and deleted, and confirm their storage medium is secure and private? Will passwords be rotated, and who is responsible for doing that, and who else is responsible for checking it's been changed in the atrata meetings? Is this an outsourcing thing, and which committee picks the company managing your backed up recordings, and is this the same group which will report on security compliance (advertised and tested randomly) where your likenesses will be stored?

Need more? Storing someone's likeness for any length of time requires a LOT of boxes checked, repeatedly, and this is often too much for most organizations, especially if they need to outsource the tech work. Asking periodically to have tapes remove your likeness and confirm it's removed will swamp an FTE, but suggest everyone do this to confirm their movements and ensure accuracy.

Recommend ALL this not be taken from contingency fund.

Glossed over after someone was shouting about my "A Child." I think it's an honor roll student thing but I wandered off.

drones. If Canada should sink funding into anything, it should be that.

ECM says what?