this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
295 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

59392 readers
2550 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago

But did they pinky promise?

[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Better BlueSky than Twitter, but I hope everyone understands by now that there’s literally no reason to take a business’s word for anything unless they somehow have legally obligated themselves to doing that thing forever. Otherwise you can only trust them to keep doing it for as long as it’s worth it from an economic perspective. I’m not saying that it can’t ever happen that a business acts out of pure goodwill, but only a fool would count on it.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Lol okay. Sounds good, bro.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

... for now

[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This seems like a clever way of saying they don't have an AI team or plans so they have no use for the data.

Brilliant!

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

"Don't be evil" ...

... for now

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I don't get it. They were rich beyond most people's wildest dreams. Why did they jump aboard the enshitification bandwagon?

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

They want to be rich beyond EVERYONE'S wildest dreams.

Why else?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Public trading... it's capitalism. By law you have to try and extort every penny.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now that I think about it I'm not sure why they had to accept investor money at all. I wonder if it would have turned out differently if they had remained 100% privately owned?

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

Because growth... Without the R&D money, Microsoft or Yahoo, or someone else would have figured out how to do what they do faster/better, waited until google was a forgotten name and then enshittified.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When you make a lot of money, the number you see in your account starts to become part of your identity because it differentiates you between you and the people you see every day. The same way if I had blue curly hair, that would become a defining factor of where I “differ” from the general public. The numbers in one’s account becomes an obsession-point.

People get obsessed with the number and how much bigger they can make it. It’s like hoarding. No amount will ever be enough. And once you’re able to buy anything, the actual value of that money becomes meaningless. So even more drive to bring the number up because that’s the only novelty you are getting.

That and power.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When you make a lot of money, the number you see in your account starts to become part of your identity because it differentiates you between you and the people you see every day.

"Tres Comas is for winners." (A wonderful line delivery by the huge asshole venture fund bro in Silicon Valley, that illustrates your point)

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›