this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
510 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59392 readers
2542 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 17 points 4 hours ago
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 32 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 25 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Disney’s clown management refused to air a trans focused episode because of the “political climate” saying that “LGBTQ+ experience are a sensitive issue” thus catering to bigots.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

To be fair, knowing Disney's track record it probably would have been as embarrassing as the short-lived super hero duo of Snowflake and Safespace...

or the Transgender Unicorn Powerpuff Girls episode

or the "Quagmire's Dad" episode of Family Guy

or the Women's Prison episode of "Lost Girl"

...Look I don't trust big name mainstream companies to touch trans voices with a 69 foot pole in a way that makes me give any reaction other than "Can you just call me a slur and be done with it? That would be less offensive at this point!"

(Though Indie platforms are a lot better at this given things like Celeste being an entire game comparing the trans experience of coming out and transitioning to climbing a mountain and Helluva Boss' actually having Millie's Sister be a likable character who is openly trans but not on a soapbox nor a punching line. Implying her existence is valid and not worth mocking OR apologizing for.)

To be even farier, choosing neutrality in times of oppression means you side with the oppressor.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Oh I suppose they don’t need our money

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I think it's more trying to win political favor by spending big with the company owned by a member of the incoming presidential administration.

Or it's just wanting to market their ads on that platform and as you said, not having the balls to stick to their boycott

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That seems to be what everyone involved with a political party or major corporation did... Make a big show of "We resisted him once, and we'll do it again!" then go "Okay, everyone it's time to line up and kiss Orange Man ass! Biden will you please get the ball rolling with some more of that high road crap?"

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 53 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's extraordinarily on brand of them

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I was going to say that's incredibly on brand for Disney. Everything I have ever heard about Comcast seems to back up this move.

I'm surprised about IBM though, more because I didn't realize they were still around than anything else.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

IBM sold "inmate" counting machines to Nazi Germany. Like, sent techs there to the camps to size up the requirements and everything. It should NOT come as a surprise that they're back on X - they've never had an issue with Fascism (or any other ism) as long as they had money to spend on overpriced iron.

[–] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but why would they even need a machine to count the prisoners? If they didn't feed their victims and were planning to murder them anyways I'm having trouble understanding why they wouldn't be okay with just a loose head count. Was it really just for counting?

I hope I'm not coming across as insensitive, I've just never heard about this and it sounds so ominous.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust

Black reports that every Nazi concentration camp maintained its own Hollerith-Abteilung (Hollerith Department), assigned with keeping tabs on inmates through use of IBM's punchcard technology.[2]: 351  In his book, Black charges that "without IBM's machinery, continuing upkeep and service, as well as the supply of punch cards, whether located on-site or off-site, Hitler's camps could have never managed the numbers they did."[2]: 352 

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 92 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Kinda lends itself to the theory that they are part of the Problem

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 19 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I have no love for big corps, but they're likely just reading the writing on the wall. they have to deal with retribution for the next 4-12 years and they have no interest becoming the rebels. I'm kinda impressed they stepped away at all other than it probably was money spent for nothing.

[–] fern@lemmy.autism.place 28 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

IBM supported the Nazis, and if they're the only tech giant not fighting musk they're going to get the kickbacks. Corps dont do "writing on the wall" anymore, they chase money, which may look similar but the goals are different.

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The writing on the wall is if you want government money don't piss off the pool boy of cheetolini

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 9 hours ago

This political science 101...

Always has been.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 19 hours ago

the writing on the wall and money are not mutually exclusive

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 31 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Good thing everyone is leaving

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 41 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Doesn't matter. They're not doing it to get people to see their ads, they're doing it to bribe Elon since he has actual political power now. Kind of like how oil companies buy ads on news media, even though you don't need to be persuaded to buy oil - it's to buy favorable coverage.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

My electrical utility (PG&E) advertises all the time. Like what am I gonna do, not buy electricity? It’s so obviously just a bribe to the media companies.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

lol they already won that political chess. You still have to pay a connection fee and a transmission fee and a lawsuit settlement fee and an environmental remediation fee, even if you use 0 kW/h. Also with the NEM 3 plan if you have any excess solar generation you give it to them at about 1/10th the price that they will sell to you during the same time of day.

Edit: I exaggerated unfairly, it’s like 1/8th the price. Also for the people who adopted solar early and were promised a 25 year contract (called NEM 2) they can now magically alter the deal and change the way that credits are calculated despite the 25-year guarantee that was made.

Edit 2: did you know our governor is a large shareholder of stock in our utility company? The same one that has the power to appoint people to the board that is supposed to regulate the “private” utility? America is doing great.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 7 hours ago

I wonder if that's why Google advertisers. They are probably the most recognized company on the planet so they definitely don't need the eyeballs.

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's just going to be all brands, nazis and/or bots soon.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago

So... same-same.

wow who could have predicted this considering they're the same companies who said they wouldn't donate to republicans after january 6th three months before they started donating to republicans again.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 168 points 1 day ago (8 children)

IBM helping out the Nazis is pretty par for the course

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Good old database arms

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 30 points 1 day ago (11 children)

ITT: People realising most of the world lives outside their bubble

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago

That would be REALLY Corrupt if simply buying Ads on a Website was Enough to allow you to DIRECTLY INFLUENCE the President Of The United States! Fortunately Trump DIDNT put the Owner of X in charge of Important Oversight Decisions!

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 227 points 1 day ago (6 children)

“X’s owner now has the ear of the president-elect, a man who has a long history of helping his friends, and punishing his enemies,” said Max Willens, senior analyst, at Emarketer. “Sending at least a trickle of ad spending toward X may be seen as good for business, albeit in an indirect way.”

There's the article in a nutshell. Give Elmo money or face the wrath of the Diaper-in-Chief.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 235 points 1 day ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)

This is bending the knee

load more comments
view more: next ›