this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
78 points (92.4% liked)

Linux

48216 readers
848 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 minutes ago

Dragora Linux

One of the coolest distros, ever. It's like a mix of Alpine Linux and Slackware without dangerous firmware payloads.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 minutes ago
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 minutes ago

There was this distro that stuffs everything of a package in one folder, instead of /usr/lib & co. What was it called again?

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 2 points 37 minutes ago
[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 26 minutes ago

Of those I'be personally tried, certainly chimera linux or mageia

[–] AkatsukiLevi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

If being usable is a metric, Slackware

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Shark Linux

[–] brachypelmasmithi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

2 days ago my friend found an old SATA hard drive and gave it to me to check what's on it, and me, not having a disk station or anything, and against all better judgment, I just swapped the disk in my laptop for my friend's, and instead of my laptop being fried it turned out the disk was running something called Crunchbang Linux

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 hour ago

I used to run Reborn OS at around 2017 for a few years. It used Cnchi installer, just like Antergos, and when Antergos died, I saw Reborn as its successor. But the title went to Endeavour (why?) and Reborn never got popularity.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Limiting to those I have used daily and treated as Linux (used the terminal for example) probably Maemo. I used to carry my Nokia Internet Tablet 770, and then my N800 everywhere with me.

Maemo is also an ancestor of both Tizen and Sailfish OS

[–] sunred@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 hours ago

I see no one has mentioned Bedrock Linux yet. Not sure though how others would rate its 'obscurity' though. It's definitely a standout among distros.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No one mentioned Bunsenlabs or Crunchbang Linux here, but they aren't really that obscure.

[–] Busyvar@jlai.lu 1 points 2 hours ago

Archbang maybe more?

[–] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] Vivendi@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

SLiTaz

It's an obscure originally live usage oriented distro that you could also install. It was the first *Nix I ever used.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Oh jeez. I forgot about that. I had that running on my DS back in the day from a GBA flashcart with a big-ass CompactFlash card sticking out the bottom. Good times.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

United Linux - the famous Red Hat Enterprise Linux killer!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Linux

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

I worked on that.

It was SuSe with any branding or tools ripped out, the carcass kicked over the fence for the rest of us to try to make an OS out of.

It had no chance. What we got was a bleeding corpse after SuSE had a sellable product to compete against us all with.

It killed turbo, it killed conectiva and it killed openlinux. Horrible thing.

[–] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

hyperbola

they have a wiki with insane nonsens about why they don't package certain things

https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en%3Aphilosophy%3Aincompatible_packages

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Wait... they're militant enough about Free Software to refuse to package anything even slightly non-Free, but their "final goal" is to switch the kernel to BSD (i.e. away from copyleft)? WTF?

[–] cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

but their “final goal” is to switch the kernel to BSD (i.e. away from copyleft)?

HyperbolaBSD is a hard fork, that relicenses the OpenBSD kernel as GPL (as permitted by permissive licenses.)

HyperbolaBSD has already dug into the OpenBSD source tree and discovered numerous licensing issues.

https://git.hyperbola.info:50100/~team/documentation/todo.git/tree/openbsd_kernel-file-list-with-license-issues.md

HyperbolaBSD will be a truly libre distro that takes advantage of copyleft, while moving away from the major issues Linux is stepping into too.

[–] servobobo@feddit.nl 1 points 50 minutes ago (2 children)

It's an ancient divide in parts of the FOSS community that believes copyleft licenses are not "free" because they force you to license contributions under the same license.

[–] cqst@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 12 minutes ago

No one thinks this. Even permissively licensed BSD operating systems package GPL software and accept it as Free Software.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago)

Yeah, I know, but I would've expected a distro that describes itself as "GNU/Linux-libre" would fall on the other side of it!

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

was that translated into english from another language?

I love how they blended FAQ with meth-induced psychosis rambling.

I've gotta give them kudos for sticking to their very strict values, but holy hell is this hard to parse

[–] Vivendi@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Certain things? Fucking luddite idiots don't package 99.9% of software.

AIX Unix from the 1980s is literally more useful than that heap of garbage

[–] Allero 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Why so much rage?

Yes, Hyperbola is very ideological and super strict, but it was always meant to be that way - to provide a system that works in some way and at the same time is as ethical and "clean" as possible. Some people value it over anything, and for them, Hyperbola is a good pick.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Wow, you weren’t kidding.

[–] chloroken@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

Why did I read all of this.

[–] AnthropomorphicCat@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Jarro Negro. Made by Mexican students. And as far as I know, it's independent, not based on another distro.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 52 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (4 children)

Rebecca Black OS.
It is the only Linux distro to date built around Weston, using Wayland's full capability:

It doesn't include any Rebecca Black theming or is related to her in any way.
It's just called that cause the dev is a fan of hers.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 32 points 11 hours ago

From the name, I expected a Hannah Montana Linux type distro.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cheems@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago

Have you ever heard of arch? That's what I use by the way

load more comments
view more: next ›