this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
90 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7210 readers
299 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

All bars banned?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Saying there will be no more of attempts to take away the rooms?

Tables the laws.

So no more attempts at banning these?

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 54 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's kind of amazing how people will continue to vote for people who create policy that is proven to be ineffective at best and directly harmful at worst.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Yesterday my buddy who barely works and doesn't do overtime said: "poivrière said he would reduces taxes on overtime, I want that - why wouldn't I vote for him?" I don't blame my buddy, and we avoid discussing politics, but these people are short-sighted and cannot be saved.

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

If he really hates paying taxes he really should find a country that has low/zero taxes. I will never get over the argument about how people hate taxes and try to argue that we need to get rid of them.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 39 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Talk politics with your buddy. Sounds like they need it.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

He lives out in the sticks, I can't undo 15 years of skipping out on education (he's 38).

I do argue it in moderation, but I prefer to tackle critical thinking in general, and hope he learns to draw his own conclusions. He recently got over that the earth is not flat and that those conspiracies don't hold water. He's even starting to identify content on tiktok that is framed in a certain way.

Maybe we'll get there one day!

Edit: Tbf he's a mechanic, and a good one at that, so flat earth was an easy topic. He managed to understand we can't make oldschool carburators with flat earth physics, and he knows how those work. It's like if I tried to convince him displacement in an engine isn't real, just invented by big oil.

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 22 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He recently got over that the earth is not flat

jfk, my comrade in crisis, you have the patience of a saint.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I would highly recommend watching the documentary Behind the Curve.
It follows a group of flat earthers. It's a really good watch, a bit depressing. Gives you a look at how these people, who aren't always the stupid people we think they are, got to where they are. How their lives and social connections start falling apart because of their belief in a flat earth. And at the end, how some of them realised they were wrong.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

If I recall it was mostly simping over a crazy lady with mental illnesses and no mental chillnesses

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not really how I recall it, but I watched it during the height of lockdown...so my memory of that time is absolutely going to be full of more holes than a cheese grater....

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I am in the same boat as you. Or rather, if you're in Ontario, the same sinking ship

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm from Vancouver, but I moved to the UK in November of 2020, watched it around Xmas/new year that winter.

So... different ship, still sinking 😭

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Rough year to make a move, we almost got quarentined in Belfast ourselves

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

Gets worse. I came over on a fiancé visa, which meant we had 6 months from approval to get married. It was over a month before I got my passport with visa back after approval, and another month and a half to get everything we had lined up for me to move actually rolling. So by the time I got there we had 2 and a bit months to get married. We had done all the legal stuff to get married before covid, as we had planned to have a civil wedding in April of 2020 after visiting her family in Japan. Obviously that didn't happen. So we're in and out of lockdown. They open up, the town hall knew our situation, and would call us to book a slot pretty much the day after lifting was announced. 3 whole times the dates we picked from the available ended up being the day of or one after locking down again. Finally another lockdown was lifted and we booked again, arranged a party and everything, then locking down again, again our date was the day after. Town hall called us up and said "we have one slot available on this Thursday at 11.15am."

Long story short, if you like wild architecture, highly recommend visiting Woolwich town hall, it's painted all sorts of garish colours inside, but it's a lovely building.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

God I would love to see a flat earther realize and admit they’ve been wrong this whole time.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Imo that only feels good when it's someone who actively causes harm with their stupidy and they finally get justice. In this case I consider it to be more sad than anything else; it's a function of his upbringing, not who he is.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 6 points 20 hours ago

Well I don’t want them to feel bad, I just want to see it so I know that it actually happens and my faith in humanity can be slightly restored.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 32 points 23 hours ago

Fuck you ford.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Commie blocks would help this country's housing crisis immensely. I double dog dare him.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 12 hours ago

They would devalue owners "asset"

No

[–] MakingWork@lemmy.ca 10 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

As part of its plan to ban supervised consumption sites and close 10 of those operating in Ontario, the province has announced the creation of 19 intensive addiction recovery facilities, named HART Hubs.

A $378-million budget has been allocated to create the new spaces, which will combine addiction recovery with highly supportive housing units. The program should lead to 375 “highly supportive” housing units as part of the hub model.

That doesn't sound bad, actually.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago

Except that the minister was on CBC yesterday, and made it clear that they're following Alberta's lead of forced treatment.

You don't go to these to get clean, you get sent there by the police.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

What does HART stand for? Homeless and Really Troubled?

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 13 points 20 hours ago

That is promising, though it would be a good next step to the consumption sites rather than a replacement for them.

The consumption sites would be good first points of contact so users could be provided the treatment centre information.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago

I'd bet that the contract to build these happens to be someone owed a favor.

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 6 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I believe in previous threads on the subject, it was identified that forced rehab doesn't work. I'm too lazy to go find the threads FYI

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Didn't finland do a similar thing and basically ended homelessness? They housed the homeless and provided treatment. Most were able to leave the program because turns out having housing is a huge factor in getting off the streets. I'm not sure the details but they stressed the housing portion was very important, if you want to clean up and get a job, having a safe place to eat, sleep, and shower is essential for that.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There is way more than 400 homeless people in Ontario.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, the number of units is inadequate, but im taking about the overall strategy.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 12 hours ago

Canada can't house their non-drug users... I am a bit confused how they will be able to house drug users lol

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

No forced rehab, lol.

You're talking about housing first policy, and it has nothing to do with addiction. Well except the policy explicitly doesn't care about addiction.

I know people addicted to opiates in Finland who didn't get into care because they couldn't "prove" they had a problem since the healthcare wanted a supervised piss test and he had shy pee so bad he couldn't. So he didn't get into rehab.

You're idolising the Finnish systems a bit. A lot of them are great... on paper.

I'm not saying they don't work in real life, I'm saying the implementation is shit but the policy is still so good that despite the fucktard bureaucrats, it's still achieving a lot compared to some other countries. (Cough USA COUGH COUGH)

I've genuinely been basically blocked from life because here in Finland even recreational weed smokers are treated as complete junkies by the healthcare. Complete and utter junkies, and I'm not exaggerating. No matter how much I quote the laws and produce doctor's notes and therapist notes. It's crazy how archaic the attitudes towards even mild illegal drugs are. And the amount of hypocrisy in that, because most Finns consume quite a lot of alcohol to the point of often disabling themselves for a day or two every week.

But yeah we live so far North allowing homeless people to live on the street would literally kill them. So that's probably why we've got this covered.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It may not for some, but some former addicts say without that they would never have broken free of the downward spiral. The drugs make you only find joy in drugs, it doesn't seem to have a solution

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

After getting clean, many addicts say giving them free drugs was the worst thing you could do for them, it just helped prolong their problems and delay their treatment. This stuff is hard because those drugs and the lifestyle that can come with it will often change people beyond what they want for themselves.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Who is giving people free drugs?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

I checked my kid’s Halloween candy and found 3 whole marijuanas!

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 22 hours ago

Million dollar starter home?

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 0 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Some one in BC interviewed about safe injection sites said it is not a help, it just lengthens the slow path to suicide. Oof.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

That's because they're only one part of a whole solution. The issue was never the drugs themselves. The reasons people get addicted to drugs are largely systemic in nature. Systemic solutions for systemic problems.

I should lay out that I believe in housing as a basic human right and think that everyone is entitled to a safe and warm place to sleep. But even when arguing from a practical standpoint it's next to impossible to find a job that will hire a person with no address and possibly no government ID (need an address to get documents!). For people to even have the chance to turn their lives around they NEED a personal living space to store their belongings. Doesn't even need to be any more complex than a hotel room.

I understand the frustrations with safe consumption sites, but they are realistically solvable, and the only reason we haven't solved them is because all these politicians are too myopic to realize the long-term benefits of actually helping our communities. They do provide a real service with the guarantee of medical staff on hand and 100% pure doses that won't instantly kill you. The problem is that without all the other things in place they look very silly.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But even when arguing from a practical standpoint it’s next to impossible to find a job that will hire a person with no address and possibly no government ID (need an address to get documents!)

There are ways around that part, if we cared enough to implement them. There's a street in—I think it was Italy?—that actually has no physical existence. Addresses on that street are used to give people with no permanent housing something to write on forms that ask for an address, so they can collect mail, including legal documents and government support checks, or apply for jobs. That doesn't solve the problem of living space directly, of course, but it might be enough to provide a starting point for some people. Or it would if we had enough reasonably-priced housing.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Calgary has another system - the homeless shelter downtown has some short-term residences where you can have an address and phone number for job hunting. (And a warm place to sleep.)