this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3110 readers
243 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Kind of a bummer as it was a very minor offence and she's been making all the right noises as Transport Sec, but she's right to resign: Cabinet members should be above this kind of thing. Can't have a return to the corruption of the Conservatives

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 13 hours ago

punished for something ten years ago which received the lowest possible punishment meanwhile james mcmurdock assaults his girlfriend and keeps his job because "christian forgiveness"

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that she has resigned suggests it's not just a "minor offence" and there's potentially more to it that we don't know about.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 4 points 13 hours ago

Officially, the reason is she should specifically have informed the Government about it, i.e., the problem isn't the offence (minor or not) per se but the process. However, you may be right as Chris Curtis suggests there was more to it:

It's also understood she was unaware of any investigation by her former employer, Aviva, involving more than one mobile phone, as reported by The Times. Haigh’s team have not denied this, but have not been drawn on it either.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

The implication in the article was that this had happened more than once (phones being stolen/going missing) but it was only one occasion that this involved the police and the admission of fraud.