this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
691 points (99.3% liked)

Games

16936 readers
298 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 91 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is actually quite eye opening to me, as someone who doesn't really ever have to look at ratings as a consumer and has always just taken them for granted. Now I'm keenly aware it's yet another example of runaway capitalism. Just never thought too hard about it.

PEGI's a cunt.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

Basically all media ratings bodies are weirdly corrupt and apply ratings without any clear rhyme or reason. There's good reason to largely ignore the ratings as an adult and even as a parent

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 83 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like grounds for a defamation suit to me considering his stated opinions on gambling.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 61 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In the meantime we can start guessing which side has more money to hire lawyers

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As someone who never planned on playing Balatro, and was kind of getting tired of seeing it on my feed the way I got tired of helldivers 2 stuff right after release.

I would happily toss a tenner to the dev for a lawyer over this.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It's a really good game. As a mobile game, it's honestly up there with Stardew Valley. They are the only two mobile games I know of that check all the boxes. They are actually good games, there are no ads or micro transactions, and they're infinitely playable.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 67 points 2 days ago

i think it's clear from this these regulatory bodies primarily function to help the industry make money. indies can sometimes get co-signs from these bodies, but only if they stay in their lane. balatro has been a huge smash hit, and it feels like this body just wants to keep it down that little bit

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You didn't ask the question the ea way.

You're supposed to ask with a hefty bribe.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't need a bribe when EA is the one on the board doing the ratings.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m willing to bet PEGI was lobbied to push for that 18+ rating by ea and other publishers because balatro is taking revenue from them. They don’t get how a game without microtransactions is doing better than they are

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Baltaro devs may need to invest in gambling to earn enough money to bribe PEGI the way EA almost certainly does.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean, almost? EA is literally a member of Video Games Europe, the organization which manages PEGI.

https://www.videogameseurope.eu/about/our-membership/

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So, we're moving on from bribery and straight to conflict of interest?

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

This is the case for both PEGI and ESRB, they are insider operated organizations developed to skirt regulations in the form of 'self governance'.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seems like an advertising opportunity. First solitaire game rated 18+ without any gambling, I assume no nudity, language, etc.

[–] ouRKaoS 24 points 2 days ago

There's actually lots of foul language while playing Balatro, but it all comes from the person playing, not the game itself.

[–] blackjam_alex@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Self-regulated organization my ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Learning the names and ranking of poker hands is the devil!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Dragon Quest 11 has a T-for-Teen rating and it's got a literal casino built into the game. Roulette, poker, and slot machines. This isn't even uncommon for JRPGs. Curious how the ratings agencies just glaze over this fact when assigning their scores.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›