this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
148 points (93.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35727 readers
960 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here’s another article about how rich Jeff Bezos is. Be sure to have a barf bag at the ready.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I guess it's just about the prominence of owning crap but even if I was stupid rich I feel like I could just pay an obscene amount to rent a yacht?

[–] samc@feddit.uk 48 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Koru is a 416-foot masterpiece with three towering masts, each standing 230 feet tall, that harness kinetic energy to propel the vessel. The yacht is so massive that, for it to leave the shipyard after completion, a historic bridge in Rotterdam had to be dismantled. Bezos even offered to fund the dismantling and reconstruction of the 95-year-old De Hef bridge but later abandoned the plan amid public outcry. Eventually, Koru was towed away without her masts, which were later assembled.

The tone of this article is astonishing. "He even offered to pay to vandalise a historic building", how selfless..

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Eventually, Koru was towed away without her masts, which were later assembled.

It’s bonkers that this was an option but they still intended to dismantle the bridge instead.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Dismantle bridge option was initially chosen because it was believed the tax payers would foot the bill... I guarantee it.

Hold on, give the author a minute, this is just foreplay. It’s a good idea to stretch a bit before committing to the deepthroat.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I bet Bozos is absolutely livid about not "investing" in a presidency. He can brag about his yachts all he wants but can he say he bought a president? NoOoOo!

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

The title of the article was vomit inducing. I hate myself a lot, but not enough to read past that.

[–] Rivalarrival 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Philanthropist? More like Philanthrapist, amiright?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't “vomit-inducing”, it's rage-inducing.

If someone can give away 99% of their hoarded wealth, and still be a MULTI BILLIONAIRE, you know that the global community needs to come together and put caps on personal wealth. Taxing them isn't enough.

[–] Rivalarrival 9 points 1 day ago

Not all wealth is a problem. His yachts and their maintenance isn't actually the problem here: that money was spent. That money put shipbuilders and maintainers to work. The assets he gets from spending isn't the problem.

The problem is his registered securities: his stocks, bonds, and other financial assets. These assets aren't just wealth. They generate wealth by taking it from the working class.

What we need is a tax on all registered securities. We will exempt the first $10 million held by a natural person. This tax is payable in shares of the security. IRS liquidators will offer these shares in small lots, comprising no more than 1% of total traded volume. This minimizes the effect of the sale of these shares on their value.

The only way to keep those shares untaxed is for a natural person to hold them. They will have greater value in the hands of the working class than the ultra-rich. This tax structure will shift ownership of companies toward the working class.

Every McDonald's employee should be compensated, in part, with shares in the company.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago

I don't set why this makes you mad. I fail to see how this is mildly infuriating let alone vomit inducing.