this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
1499 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6104 readers
2175 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why did they switch from median to average for healthcare?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Why isn't he using inflation-adjusted figures for 1971?

Why isn't he comparing the cost per square foot of houses instead, since the average house today is much, much larger than the average house in 1971?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kanda@reddthat.com -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Doesn't the quotes just ruin his whole thing? You either say "so much for progress" or something like "thanks for the 'progress'". 'So much for "progress" ' feels like a double negative

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 178 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

The wealthy are much better off though. If you looked at the wage increase of the top 1%, if has risen by $800,000 a year (https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/12/09/staggering-new-data-shows-income-top-1-has-grown-100-times-faster-bottom-50-1970) since 1970.

So capitalism is working exactly the way it is supposed to. Exploiting the middle and lower classes for the rich. This is exactly the progress they want.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 113 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But somehow people are mad at queer folks and foreigners instead of the C-suite and their boards.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

But… I stopped going to Starbucks and quit buying Avocado toast? Can I buy a house yet?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] osugi_sakae@midwest.social 61 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Important to note here the important difference between "mean", aka the average, and "median", the middle number in a set. Assuming Krueger intentionally used "median", the situation is actually worse than people realize.

The average can be affected by large outliers - like billionaires. IF the "average" American makes $50,000 a year, the median could actually be more like $30,000 (totally made up numbers, as an example).

In other words, the median is the more "accurate" number to use in these comparisons because the income of the extremely wealthy has less of an impact on the result.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] badelf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But the 1% got 100 x wealthier! Ain't that great?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›