237
go rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by zeddiq@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kubica@kbin.social 44 points 8 months ago

Am I missing something? What is people upvoting here?

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 8 months ago
[-] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 8 months ago

I think it's an anti-joke referencing the go ahead fucking die bike lane meme

[-] zAkk@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

The green light plus green arrow mean it is safe to turn left, yet the sign says to yield. This must create a dangerous intersection.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 41 points 8 months ago

The warning is there to remind people that the green arrow isn't always lit when the green circle is and normal rules of yielding when turning left apply. Green arrow still gives right of way

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 36 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This must create a dangerous intersection.

So am I to understand nobody here understands how this works? You yield when the arrow isn't lit. If the arrow is green, you don't have to yield.

[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 23 points 8 months ago

one trip in typical traffic

Nobody understands a lot of basic rules.

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

My drivers manual didnt go into double traffic lights with arrows and location specific rules. It just said they would be red, yellow, and green.

So my basic confusion is: I can turn left on a green light when there is also an arrow I'm waiting for? I dont have to wait for the arrow. Wait I havent seen this because it would just be solved with a specific turning lane where I live.

[-] Fal@yiffit.net 3 points 8 months ago

That's because where you live likes to make people wait and sit at left turn lanes when there's 0 oncoming traffic. This is the perfect intersection, and I missed them from Arizona. You can turn if it's safe, but if it's busy and there's no safe time, you'll eventually get a protected left.

You know how to turn at an unprotected left, right? That's in the drivers manual. You know how to turn at a protected left as well. This is just both at the same intersection. It's really not that complicated

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago

Ok this comment is based and also helpful thanks

[-] Rivalarrival 1 points 8 months ago

These are only ever in front of specific turn lanes. The green arrow means oncoming traffic has a red ball. The green ball alone means oncoming traffic also has a green ball, and left turning traffic must follow normal rules, not protected arrow rules.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

I personally find this confusing. The sign reads “Left turn yield on green”, which implies that you yield when the arrow is lit. A sign that says “right lane stop on red” means stop when the light is red, not when it isn’t.

[-] boothin@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

You're ignoring the giant green circle on the sign, which means you yield on green solid, not green arrow. Green arrows give you right of way. If you're in the US and drive, please learn the road signs

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

Not arguing about what the actual traffic laws are. I am arguing that this is objectively confusing design. "Left turn yield on green (CIRCLE)" does not mean that left turn yields on green. It means, "when turning left, but the solid light is green, and the left turn arrow is not lit up, yield to oncoming traffic. But if the solid light is green and the left turn arrow is lit, then do not yield." So you literally do not yield on green.

Sure you can just tell people to "please learn the road signs" no matter how terrible... or we can acknowledge that this is an asinine design. I have no idea why anyone would spend energy defending this.

[-] boothin@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

The thing is, you're not putting a dissertation on one of these signs. You're already supposed to yield on a solid green if you're turning left without a green arrow, that's already the law. This sign is a reminder for the stupid people about something they're already supposed to do, not allow someone who's never driven in their life to learn the laws as they go.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

“Left turn yield until (left arrow)”

[-] Fal@yiffit.net 1 points 8 months ago

So if it's red you can turn but just have to yield?

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

No, red means stop.

[-] betamark@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I interpret the sign correctly and would still strongly argue that it is a bad sign. I appreciate what you have added to the conversation!

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

Its a bad sign. I agree.

[-] Fal@yiffit.net 1 points 8 months ago

But if the solid light is green and the left turn arrow is lit, then do not yield

If I remember correctly, both lights would never be lit at the same time. It's either a green circle (yield) or a green arrow (right of way) just like literally every other intersection in existence ever.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

What are you taking about? Plenty of intersections are green on left turn and straight at the same time.

[-] Fal@yiffit.net 1 points 8 months ago

Those are in different light boxes. This is 1 light box. The green and arrow won't be lit up at the same time in the same light box

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago

If you're in the US and drive, I'm shocked you aren't respectful of a careful driver.

[-] boothin@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

A driver that doesn't know the standard road signs and road laws is more dangerous. Stopping in the middle of the road to figure out what a common sign means isn't being careful, it's being a bad driver and making the road more dangerous for everyone else.

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

I figured it out. This just isnt common where I live, my road would have a turning lane.

[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

This would most likely be in its own turn lane, as you don't want turning traffic that has to sometimes yield for oncoming to block others going straight. The lights give two different conditions, one where the driver has right-of-way (the arrow), and the other where it's up to the driver to determine conditions before proceeding.

In my area instead of this setup we now have two lights - one is a green arrow alone for right to turn, and the other is a yellow flashing arrow meaning to turn with caution only when it's clear. And while that may sound more obvious, when they were initially put up people had a lot of trouble with it. Just like when the first roundabouts started popping up. Now both are common and part of normal driving.

[-] Triple_B@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 months ago

When the green arrow is absent, you may still turn, but you have to yield. Green arrow indicates right of way.

[-] Rivalarrival 1 points 8 months ago

The sign says to yield on a green "ball" signal, not a green arrow.

The sign is superfluous: left turn is already supposed to yield on a green ball.

[-] CarlsIII@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

It might be an antimeme.

[-] The2b@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago
[-] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago
[-] casmael@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I’m bri’ish so I don’t understand

[-] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago

I'm European so me neither

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I’m European too 🇪🇺 Brentry 2027

[-] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

lol sure buddy

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
237 points (99.6% liked)

196

15695 readers
1 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS