this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
163 points (98.8% liked)

chapotraphouse

13640 readers
902 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] queermunist@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 days ago

By half-your-age-plus-seven rules he was only barely in the clear. Sus?๐Ÿค”

[โ€“] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago (10 children)

I don't really like the age gap discourse. I think it is attempting to use identity politics to explain structural peobelms. Why is an age gap bad? Because cis het relationships are inherently bad and without sufficient experience to navigate them younger partners are likely to be hurt? Or because they are unlikely to lead to a successful marriage and kids? That's awfully partirarchy pilled. Let's imagine the converse. Which is better a boomer? Or a boomer that has stayed socially adaptable enough to be able to prosocially enguage with the younger generations? I get you don't want boomers being predatory in other spaces but that is a failure to develop the tools to exclude predatory people. Something about this discourse and skill based match making discourse is kicking around in my head and ai haven't figured out a dialectic answer to all this.

The issue with age gap discourse is that it often devolves into conflating the (visible) potential for abuse with abuse itself. There's nothing you can say about an age gap in a relationship between two consenting adults that wouldn't equally apply to a relationship between two people who make drastically different incomes, or who have different levels of social aptitude with their friends and family, or differences in physical size/strength. It also starts to feel like invalidating abuse that isn't immediately clear just from looking at the people involved.

90% of age gap discourse is just violent cattle looking for someone to antagonize

either you're a pedophile or you're not a pedophile

if you raise the consent-age two more years people will just adjust the ages and call you a creep for that

load more comments (8 replies)
[โ€“] TrashGoblin@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago
[โ€“] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 13 points 3 days ago

Watching twin peaks rn and cooper libertarian-approaching

Power dynamics.

[โ€“] blunder@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

if both people are adults and safe in making whatever decision they want then it's fine. I know someone who dates several decades above their age, I say have fun. People can be abusive manipulators to people their own age as well.

[โ€“] Philosoraptor@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago
[โ€“] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

only gay marriages are allowed (kinda based ngl)

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ