this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
97 points (93.7% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1459 readers
341 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlfh@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yogthos is the kind of piece of shit that "critically supports" bombing Ukrainian kindergartens and maternity wards as long as, somewhere in the world, at least one Western tear is shed over it. Blocking them makes the fediverse far less unpleasant.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 hour ago

One of the best decisions I've made

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 8 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

I dont get how tankies can support a "communist" nation like China that has an investor class and whose system requires the mistreatment of the proletariat.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 minutes ago

Because they don't support communism. They just like one version of ogliarchy better than the other.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 hours ago

Average Yogthos verbal vomit.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 29 points 3 hours ago

Huh. And here I thought Yogthos was a Chinese plant. Turns out they like the taste of Russian leather just the same.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 50 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Wut? Was he talking about the previous Ukrainian government, sponsored by Russia™? I can't make sense of what he is saying, actually.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 26 minutes ago

Dude doesn't know about Euromaidan. I wish some of these children would go to russia.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 33 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I had to reread it a few times myself, but I'm pretty sure that's what he's talkin about

Because everyone knows Russia is well known for their totally legit free and fair elections/s

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

i got a veteran friend who would not take kindly to people saying her country should be permanently tied to a country whose name she refuses to spell correctly. the .ml tankists have, apparently, no concept of a false flag operation

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Or they argue in bad faith.

I hope so because I don't want to believe people can be so stupid they can probably not breathe and walk simultaneously.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 2 hours ago

Kremlin talking points that was thoroughly debunked in 2022 but here we are...

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 9 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I saw this and it was the trigger I needed to finally block that community. I'm still trying to figure out how to block .ml entirely.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm still trying to figure out how to block .ml entirely.

I think this only becomes available to you if your instance is on a certain version.

But we shouldn't just do instance blocks, that's just ignoring the problem. We should all be on the lookout for this kinda BS so we can screenshot, compile and eventually petition our respective instance admins to defederate.

As well as cross-posting any good material you come across from a .ml comm to any other non-.ml comm

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, you call out tankie bullshit on .ml, they ban you on every /c

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Lol you can catch a .ml site-ban for calling out their BS in other instances too, they dgaf

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I got banned for calling xi winnie, zero regrets

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 2 hours ago

Awww yiss, now i got profile bling

[–] nevaseerius@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 hours ago

Lmaooo these dingos think Kim jong un will holler at them if they suck his e-weiner enough

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 14 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

For those who like me can't read the original meme text:

"Leftists" whose political opinions on China, DPR Korea, Cuba, Israel, and Ukraine mirror the U.S. State Department's position

And then the face the person is seeing in the mirror is a clown.

I wouldn't have even tried to engage on the China / N Korea / Ukraine side of the analogy. The other one is a lot more absurd. I don't think there is any non-trivial number of "leftists" on Lemmy who think that Israel "has a right to defend herself" and deserves tons of weapons, or that Cuba is a terrorist state.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

Israel “has a right to defend herself”

It does but what it does far exceeds legitimate defence. And what it does also isn't building Zionism because antagonising people goes directly against the goal of creating a place for Jews to live in peace and prosperity.

I gave up on it when the fucker killed Rabin and it's been a constant slide into full-on fascism since then, as in, fascist modes of thinking captured more and more of Israeli politics to the point where even the left is largely cooked. They may disavow what Amir did but they still share his outlook towards "security". They may not be actively genocidal but still support "antagonise until Palestinians give up". The situation is fucked in pretty much every way that a situation can possibly be fucked.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 2 points 23 minutes ago

Fully agreed. If it wasn't clear from my quotation marks, I think Israel is now actively exterminating a civilian population, after pursuing a policy of slow extermination spanning back for decades, with the goal of eventually eradicating the state and people of Palestine completely. And that policy of slow extermination led to the atrocities of October 7th as an absolutely predictable consequence. I put quotes around "defend herself" because that's how the State Department talks about it, but nothing Israel is doing right now makes any sense in that context or any other aside from exterminating Palestinians as fast as they can get away with. Netanyahu refusing to say if he agrees to the current latest cease-fire in exchange for getting all the hostages back before they're all dead, is just yet another prime example from today.

He doesn't want the hostages back. He wants to kill Palestinians, and if them having hostages makes that easier, then he's in favor of them keeping the hostages. I don't know why anyone who writes about geopolitics buys into the ludicrous framework of it being any other way, let alone this fantasy of "defend herself." I get why the State Department says that. They're lying on purpose to accomplish their goals. What the newspapers are doing when they say it, I couldn't tell you.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate on Cuban or Cuban-sponsored terrorism? I mostly agree with the US positions on these except for Cuba and maybe Israel. I also don't know Cuba that well. I know that some Cuban protests are suppressed, but I'm pretty sure that's not what terrorism means.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The US has been saying since the 80s that Cuba is a sponsor of state terrorism. I think it's mostly made up because they're communist and we don't like them. I think maybe Castro did a little bit of what when we do it is called "covert ops," but I'm not aware of Cuba being any kind of major sponsor of terrorism, in the same way that Saudi Arabia or Israel is, for example.

The State Department has some very minor legitimate beef with modern-day Cuba because they suppressed some protests, yes, and put a few hundred people in prison more or less for being the opposition. Every so often they do minor dictator stuff like that which we officially tut-tut at them for. On the whole, though, our beef with Cuba is just because nobody's forgotten the days when Che Guevara was public enemy number one, and Cuba got away with being on his side, and for no other reason that's more logical than that one.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 54 minutes ago

The US has been saying since the 80s that Cuba is a sponsor of state terrorism.

Angola stuff, I think. Not that our hands were clean in that conflict.