this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
94 points (98.0% liked)

games

20655 readers
389 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Plenty of games, especially strategy and simulator games, have game mechanics related to politics or economics. From Recettear’s “Capitalism Ho!” to Hearts of Iron 4’s focus trees, political descriptions can be added to flavor game mechanics, and because different game devs have endless variation in personal worldviews, these additions can be absurdly bad at times. Even if the mechanic itself is good, it can have dunk-worthy labelling. Post the worst that you can think of, even if they come from an otherwise great game.

I’ll start: In Civilization VI, different government types you choose have different slots for policy cards, which let you select political policy bonuses for your civilization. In the modern age, two of the government types you can choose are “Democracy” and “Communism”. Already this is liberal drivel conflating Communism with non-democracy and “authoritarianism”. But the policy slots for these governments are even dumber, as Democracy gets more “diplomatic” and “economic” policies, and Communism gets more “millitary” policies. Famously, America and the west (clearly what Democracy is inspired by) never destabilized the world with arms manufactoring and invasions, I guess.

(page 2) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don’t have another example but just wanted to say the Civ implantation was so bad it kinda ruined the game for me. Thankfully Victoria 3 does it very well and has filled that gap when I’m itching to play that type of game.

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

Personally I am looking forwards to EU5

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›