this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
171 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

51298 readers
653 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was recently intrigued to learn that only half of the respondents to a survey said that they used disk encryption. Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows have been increasingly using encryption by default. On the other hand, while most Linux installers I've encountered include the option to encrypt, it is not selected by default.

Whether it's a test bench, beater laptop, NAS, or daily driver, I encrypt for peace of mind. Whatever I end up doing on my machines, I can be pretty confident my data won't end up in the wrong hands if the drive is stolen or lost and can be erased by simply overwriting the LUKS header. Recovering from an unbootable state or copying files out from an encrypted boot drive only takes a couple more commands compared to an unencrypted setup.

But that's just me and I'm curious to hear what other reasons to encrypt or not to encrypt are out there.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I encrypt everything, with unique complex passwords, that I have a safe mnemonic system for remembering and retrieving.

[–] Extrasvhx9he 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah all my drives are encrypted with LUKS mostly because of home burglaries (bad area and whatnot). I still keep backups regardless on drives that are also encrypted

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (18 children)

Absolutely. LUKS full disk encryption. Comes as an opt-in checkbox on Ubuntu, for example.

And I too cannot understand why this is not opt-out rather than opt-in. Apparently we've decided that only normies on corporate spyware OSs need security, and we don't.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No need as none of them are networked

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you physically crush and grind your drives once they are end-of-life?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] Xiisadaddy@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Depends. On external drives yes. On internal boot drive no. I had performance issues and thermal issues with it so stopped on boot drives.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis 1 points 1 month ago

I always encrypt my computer SSD as well as my external backup drive. I just wish that when installing a Linux distro and when selecting encryption that it would work with multiple drives

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Only encrypt the home partition, for the root partition it just unnecessarily slows down the system.

Also, I think, there could be different approaches instead of encryption. AFAIK, android doesn't use encryption underneath, but uses a semi-closed bootloader (which means, if you install a different OS, all user data gets wiped). I'm currently investigating the feasibility of such an approach in the long term.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›