this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
378 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19378 readers
4670 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 60 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 31 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Only one solution.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 76 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Yep I am not giving to many conspiracies but I do believe he cheated in many states. Only how he could win the popular vote. But unfortunately he still won because of sexiest and racist.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (12 children)

What evidence do you have other than "a feeling"? Which is what the republicans have been insisting on since 2020.

MAYBE there was limited election fraud in swing states. Nation wide, there was consistently lower Democratic turnout in basically every county in every state. That is HOW trump got the popular vote. Because people were too fucking stupid and selfish to go fucking vote.

So unless trump controlled every single machine in every single county? He won. And if he DID control that, he would have won by much larger and much stupider margins.

The problem was not "the computers" (that is gonna be the 2026 and 2028 problem....). The problem is that we spent the past 8 years smiling and nodding when self proclaimed leftists can't go five fucking minutes without ranting about how nobody's vote matters and we all deserve to suffer because their candidate didn't win in two thousand and fucking sixteen.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

"He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote-counting computers, and we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide."

Trump is so old he probably means human computers. They were still around when he was a young man. Right? He meant the people counting the votes, right? Heaven forbid he actually tried to monkey with the voting machines. Because that would be illegal, and totally unthinkable for someone with a stainless reputation like His Orangeness...

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 28 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Don't assume there's anything meaningful behind what he says. His algorithm is mind-numbingly simple: say stupid shit. If it gets attention, double down.

That's all there is. There is no thought and no feeling. He has no more inner life than a cockroach.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

say stupid shit. If it gets attention, double down.

And that's exactly how he gets away with all the stuff he does: people simply assume he's talking crap, until they realize he wasn't.

Trump should not be allowed to say anything remotely controversial without meeting fact-checking and extreme resistance at each and every step. Either that'll teach him to be careful with what he says, or he'll eventually get caught incriminating himself. If people let him say any old thing because of the sheer volume of bullshit coming out of his piehole, he's gonna keep getting away with everything.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

If anything, this is a distraction from something else.

[–] BoobaAwooga@lemmynsfw.com 38 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah remember that analysis by some data scientists that said there was some fishy shit going on?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Do you have a source? I don't remember it and I'm not turning much up by searching.

[–] 50MYT@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Here is the article that was published about it.

Bullet ballots, and starlink

Take it with a grain of salt. But the dots are starting to line up.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It looked reasonable on the surface, largely because of the "factual" claims he made. But as soon as you start peeking into the publicly available numbers, it falls apart. He said 11% bullet ballots in NC. It was around 2.2%. That's the one I verified myself.

In North Carolina, which saw 11% of votes for Trump cast as bullet votes.

NC had 5.67m presidential votes. NC had 5.54m gubernatorial votes. A difference of 128k. 128k/5.67m = 2.257%

I checked a couple other NC races as well. It doesn't get close. Not to mention places like NYC went more red too. Do we think they cheated in NYC too? Did they cheat literally everywhere?

Of course the bullet ballot guy makes the claim that the swing states and the surrounding states are different, but they really weren't. His numbers are just lies.

[–] BoobaAwooga@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 15 points 23 hours ago

That guy neverehad a source to make the claims that he did. Rebecca Watson addressed this guy's claims

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago

Oh good. Because that matters.

[–] Peer@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Some people may think that, but from the video it is not clear. He just mentions Elon knows computers very well. There will be enough real news with president Trump, we don’t need this kind of journalism.

[–] the_wise_wolf@feddit.org 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It sounds like standard demented Trump. Musk -> Technology -> Computers -> Voting Machines -> Hey, everybody remember, how I won the election?!

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago

It would be like him to brag about it now that he can operate with impunity.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 5 points 19 hours ago

He just mentions Elon knows computers very well.

Which is proof it's just more nonsense.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 2 points 22 hours ago

You've got to spend money to make money

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›