this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
605 points (99.2% liked)

Comic Strips

13476 readers
3930 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReadyUser31@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Trying not to spoil it but this is a plot point in a relatively famous, relatively recent sci-fi book, where the characters need to record a warning that lasts for millennia. They end up carving it into the rock of Pluto since all other data mediums would fail over that timespan.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That sounds like a great book, if only I new what it was called.

[–] ReadyUser31@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago

Ah nice. That's already on my list. I did see the Netflix series.

[–] noughtnaut@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I do not know of this movie, but you're description reminded me of the most excellent read Deep Time, by Gregory Benford. Didn't consider other planets though, as this is actually a non-fiction work.

[–] tibi@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Only downside is that only data that people care about right now is being saved. But what seems useless now might become valuable in the future. It's hard to grasp how much data has been forgotten on some old computers, or some CDs, or websites that have gone dark.

[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's hard to imagine how much data is lost on old notepads, journals, even personal voice recordings.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

I want my journal to die with me. It's got a lot of painfully honest stuff that could hurt the people I love.

[–] Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Storing data for decades or even centuries is a difficult thing. But the problem isn't the storage it's the data format!

Who knows if a person 300 years from now has a program that can open .png or .jpg? Or the dreaded .doc and .xls that even Microsoft has problems with today. This poor future fellow probably won't have the capatibilities and might need a few years or decades to develop a reader app.

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago
[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] moopet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

Needs more 9gag logos

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

Perfection. But we could deep fry it a bit.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

About that... we could record someone's every word and different people would read entirely different things into it. Consider how strangers have reacted to your own internet comments.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Ray Bradbury famously directly told people they were interpreting Fahrenheit 451 wrong while he was alive and they still didn't believe it

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 2 points 22 hours ago

Bradbury just complained that people were gonna stop buying his books. He gripes in multiple books that people dont read anymore since that's how he made money.

[–] johsny@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lena@gregtech.eu 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago

I love how unoriginal the human brain is sometimes. I had the same exact thing I was about to comment

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've always thought that argument only works as long as data is free or close to free. Once it incurs a cost, I think copies end up getting removed. I think it's fundamentally flawed to say the internet will never forget.

[–] Nytarsha@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The media on the internet will all eventually be behind a paywall. It seems like we're heading in that direction.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

That seems to imply everything you're willing to pay for would still be accessible. That's just not the case I think. Things dissappear full stop, also if you do want to pay for it.

A lot of non super popular, not very internationally known media eventually disappears into non-accessible copies in private collections: hard drives, non public accessible computers etc and at the same time becomes nearly impossible to purchase or otherwise retrieve online. For example public broadcasters in Europe: they don't want to put in the money and effort to preserve their entire archives, they don't make everything from the past accessible, things do get lost in their archives (sometimes as a conscious choice) and at the same time it is illegal for private people to archive it... until it is too late. For example lots and lots of radio plays are probably already lost forever.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, for thot pics, there’s always more jpeg. For everything else, there’s lossless data formats.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Even with jpeg, you only lose data each time it's encoded. If you save the file instead of taking a screenshot, the quality remains the same.

That said, I don't know if there's a digital storage method widely used that will last longer than a book without some sort of active aspect to the storage (like copying the files to a new medium every now and then).

I think punch cards are one that can, but they aren't used much anymore due to poor density and speed, plus being susceptible to literal bugs. It's possible to encode digital information into carved rock, but that would also have density issues (higher density means less reliability because the amount of damage required to make it unreadable is lower).

I think there's a good chance that a lot of the knowledge we have today could be lost entirely if civilization collapses to a certain degree just due to how we store it.

[–] LinuxEnjoyer@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I think there’s a good chance that a lot of the knowledge we have today could be lost entirely if civilization collapses to a certain degree just due to how we store it.

We do have some backups.

https://archiveprogram.github.com/arctic-vault/

[–] DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

We have stone tablets from back when humans invebted written language. I vote we back up critical data using this method.

[–] moopet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

You mean we should consider recording information on silicon?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You’re right, the format’s integrity is only as good as the medium upon which it’s stored. Hard disks are really only good for a few decades if left untouched. Punchcards maybe a few thousand years if sealed up well.

The “active aspect” you mentioned is the key. There are file storage systems which employ regenerative error correction to achieve exactly this sort of desired outcome. I use one on my home server called ZFS. It was originally developed by Sun Microsystems and works great. The only catch is that there is a limit to the number of drives in your storage array which can fail before data becomes unrecoverable. So, you have to be constantly vigilant, and if a drive is starting to go, replace it before a potential worst case scenario of cascade failure.

Unfortunately, I don’t know of a way we could store something indefinitely without this kind of active monitoring and occasional TLC. If a sort of caretaker is required, this might be a good job for AI with real world robotic hooks - have it monitor the array and fabricate replacement drives for installation as needed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Good luck finding the raw original video of anything these days. The amount of 3gp an rm files that used to float around compared to the reactionary emoji text bs you see today. Get off my lawn.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ironically this is original data we are viewing now.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well it wasn't even posted on your instance, so you're already just viewing a thirdhand copy of it

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Despite that its still the same actual bits of data

[–] moody@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's identical, but it's not the same bits

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

yes it is. all electrons are just the same one moving very fast.

[–] ouRKaoS 2 points 1 day ago

Heh, heh...

The Bits of Theseus

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›