this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
306 points (91.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7518 readers
356 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During negotiations with the DNC and the Harris campaign, we were repeatedly told by interlocutors that Harris couldn’t meet any of our basic requests (a policy shift from Biden, a Palestinian speaker at the DNC, a statement distinguishing herself from Trump on Israel, or even a meeting with Michigan families who lost loved ones to Israeli bombs) because of AIPAC-aligned politicians like Fetterman, who might take to TV, rile up suburban white and Jewish voters, and fracture the party’s coalition in a swing state.

That political calculus alienated a key voting bloc, although likely not large enough to have shifted the ultimate election outcomes, that should be part of a durable Democratic majority. But few will ever be held accountable for that choice.

A Fetterman staffer condemning Uncommitted for not advocating for Palestinians 'the right way' is like an arsonist scolding the fire department for using the wrong hose.

Source

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This was my thoughts all along. By condemning the genocide they would have lost more votes than gained. It sucks that politicians have to choose votes over morality (the ones that actually have morality). The system is definitely broken.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 46 points 4 days ago (7 children)

It is truly sad that the Democratic Party has become this incompetent.

[–] Saint_La_Croix_Crosse@midwest.social 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Iron law of institutions. The entire point of the Democratic party is to fundraise and secure sinecure jobs for its members. Winning elections is a convenient side bonus. So they basically ran on Trump's first term platform and full support of Israel, since it is more important than winning the election. That's what the arms manufacturers, and other donors want.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don't think it's incompetence. After-all they have successful defended the corporate duopoly for at least 50 years, probably longer. Sure there are some upstarts, but the machinations of the party ensure those people never get to actually threaten the status quo. Plus they make good sound-bytes so that the democrats can talk about how they are "fighting," in unspecific ways.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I blame the voters who just flat out couldn't be bothered. If they'd all showed and at least voted 3rd party on the president, at least the fascist wouldn't have control of Congress.

I blame Dems for shitting on everything so hard that people made the choice to not show up.

Non-voters can't fix what they've done, protest voters can't change what's happened. The Dems can absolutely still fix their party. There's only one group who deserves our ire in this moment.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Fetterman won his nomination when his brain was still functioning. If you don't like him, primary him. It would probably work.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›