683
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/news@lemmy.world

Lubbock County, Texas, joins a group of other rural Texas counties that have voted to ban women from using their roads to seek abortions.

This comes after six cities and counties in Texas have passed abortion-related bans, out of nine that have considered them. However, this ordinance makes Lubbock the biggest jurisdiction yet to pass restrictions on abortion-related transportation.

During Monday's meeting, the Lubbock County Commissioners Court passed an ordinance banning abortion, abortion-inducing drugs and travel for abortion in the unincorporated areas of Lubbock County, declaring Lubbock County a "Sanctuary County for the Unborn."

The ordinance is part of a continued strategy by conservative activists to further restrict abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade as the ordinances are meant to bolster Texas' existing abortion ban, which allows private citizens to sue anyone who provides or "aids or abets" an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy.

The ordinance, which was introduced to the court last Wednesday, was passed by a vote of 3-0 with commissioners Terence Kovar, Jason Corley and Jordan Rackler, all Republicans, voting to pass the legislation while County Judge Curtis Parrish, Republican, and Commissioner Gilbert Flores, Democrat, abstained from the vote.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Time to take out the Texas legislature......

... To dinner! What a good job those yokel fucks are doing.

Also.. does Texas just not have women who vote?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] theostermanweekend@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 months ago

Sure. Its all about controllino women. This is some Taliban shit. Fuck these guys.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.ca 18 points 8 months ago

Jfc, I hope all women in Texas have their sights on eventually moving out and away. This is absurd

[-] Riyria@sopuli.xyz 17 points 8 months ago

The commerce clause would like a word.

[-] Smacks@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

And I'm sure it was penned by some 105 year old dinosaur

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The ordinance is part of a continued strategy by conservative activists to further restrict abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade as the ordinances are meant to bolster Texas' existing abortion ban, which allows private citizens to sue anyone who provides or "aids or abets" an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy.

Hol’ up….

As dumb as both this and the “I can sue you because abortion!” thing are, this one cannot “bolster” the other because it specifically targets women.

In the original one, the woman obtaining the abortion cannot be targeted. It has to be a doctor, friend, clinic escort, Uber driver (yes, it’s fucking dumb ok), etc. but not the woman.

So this one kinda violates the other LOL

[-] rustbuckett@lemmings.world 15 points 8 months ago

How could they even begin to enforce this?!

[-] organicmolecules@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago

They get your neighbors to turn you in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MattGade@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

What a middle aged country is in some ways

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 12 points 8 months ago

This doesn't go against the constitution?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 8 months ago

For the first time, I find myself compelled to find out what those stupid sovereign cit fucks are referencing with all their talk about "right to travel."

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
683 points (98.2% liked)

News

21700 readers
3265 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS