this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
317 points (98.8% liked)

News

25269 readers
4690 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has ordered lie detector tests for DHS staff to identify leaks that allegedly foiled immigration raids, including a failed Colorado operation targeting Venezuelan gang members.

The directive, leaked to Bloomberg, requires polygraph questions about unauthorized communications with media and nonprofits. Despite polygraphs' unreliability, DHS insists they are necessary for national security.

The crackdown follows frustration from Trump’s border czar Tom Homan over compromised raids and aligns with broader MAGA-era efforts to control government communication.

(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Just remember, it’s not a lie if you believe it. - George Costanza

[–] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Just remember, it’s not a lie if you believe it. - George Costanza

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

what's next, ouija boards?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's the dogs... Specifically puppies that aren't "acting right"... They're "leaking"...

Good thing she has experience dealing with bad dogs.

🤦‍♀️🫏🤡🖕🖕

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  1. Is thedailybeast.com considered a reputable news source?
  2. To snuff out is to kill; usually murder. Did the author mean sniff out?
[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it’s meant to “snuff out” as in “kill” the leaks, not necessarily the perpetrators. Like, we’re gonna do this to end the leaks. The wording is somewhat awkward and questionable, but not necessarily incorrect. Snuff out is used to refer to extinguishing candles, so it’s not unheard of to use it in contexts other than ending human lives.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I see your line of thinking, but let's also remember that polygraphs wouldn't end leaks even if they really were lie detectors. The most they could do in that fictional scenario would be to reveal the leaks; to sniff them out. To snuff them out would require some additional, separate action.

Also snuff out applies to candles only because the snuff is literally part of a candle's wick. The phrase is not being used literally here, which leaves us with the common non-literal meaning: to murder.

I still think the most charitable interpretation is that author confused it with sniff out, and failed to consider the grisly meaning of what they wrote.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you want to go the linguistic history route, “snuff” literally meant “to sniff at in order to examine” starting in 1810, so it’s technically (the best kind of?) correct to use it in this context, although still awkward in terms of modern colloquialisms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TxTechnician@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Scientology taught me that lie detectors are fake. We should use E Meters instead

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›