this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
40 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1638 readers
87 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 3 points 7 hours ago

On the subject of AI agents, I saw a baffling commercial (or well half saw it several times) where they where trying to sell I think AI powered phones where they had the revolutionary AI agent idea of randomly feeling like you should meet up with friends, then just go to your friends and tell your phone that it should reschedule everything they had planned for a day later. Which baffled me in various ways, as mentioning this to your phone doesn't do anything, you can't reschedule without input from other people. Sure I might not want to go to my doc appointment today, but I can't just tell my phone 'hey tell my doc I will do it tomorrow not today'. And this is ignoring the fact that with AI reliability you need to actually check they did it correctly. It might have forgotten the order of the days, I mean it is a technology that already has failed on the most basic task. Just a very strange commercial, disconnected from how modern agendas and time works.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why? Per the poll: “a lack of reliability.” The things being sold as “agents” don’t … work.

Vendors insist that the users are just holding the agents wrong. Per Bret Taylor of Sierra (and OpenAI):

Accept that it is imperfect. Rather than say, “Will AI do something wrong”, say, “When it does something wrong, what are the operational mitigations that we’ve put in place to deal with it?”

I think this illustrates the situation of the LLM market pretty well, not just at a shallow level of the base incentives of the parties at play, but also at a deeper level, showing the general lack of humanity and toleration of dogshit exhibited by the AI companies that they are trying to brainwash everyone with.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

It's not unlike medical supplements before they got pushed away from real drugs and had all the markings on them about being just supplements rather than panaceas..

ATTENTION: LLM is not a real worker. Consult a competent manager before firing everyone around you.

Snake oil won't be a miscomparison on all points.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

If a human employee makes a mistake, I can find out why, and correct the process used by the employee.

If an AI makes a mistake, I (currently) cannot see how it came to the result, nor can I correct it to not take that action again.