this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
152 points (97.5% liked)

World News

41146 readers
3780 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

NASA has lowered the estimated risk of asteroid 2024 YR4 striking Earth in December 2032 to 1.5%, down from 3.1% a day earlier. The European Space Agency's (ESA) estimate stands at 1.38%.

The asteroid, 40-90 meters wide, could cause significant city-level destruction but not a global catastrophe.

The projected impact corridor spans the Pacific, South America, Africa, and South Asia.

NASA also estimates a 0.8% chance of the asteroid hitting the Moon.

(page 2) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Is this the new seven minutes to midnight? We're 1.5% to asteroid.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I feel like hitting the moon could fuck us up even worse long term, with effects on the ocean?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Well we'd lose the tides, which would devastate ocean life. We'd lose moonlight, which would devastate nocturnal animals. The axial tilt would change, so seasons would become more even, devastating plants that rely on seasonal cycles, or become more extreme, devastating everything.

The book Seveneves explores this scenario, but is mostly about how humanity moves to space to survive.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Could it even completely obliterate the moon? Just not being tidally locked would be awful, but completely changing its trajectory/orbit and probably fuck up our atmosphere with debris seems more likely

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's probably not big enough to shatter the moon, but enough to at least alter its orbit. I'm not enough of an astrophysicist to say how much. I haven't looked up the forces involved, so I can't even give a ballpark estimate.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It technically would alter the moons orbit, but not by a lot. This asteroid would impact with roughly the energy of a nuclear bomb, which sounds like a lot, but on the scale of our moon it's negligible.

A rough estimation given my limited understanding of physics is that to change the moon's orbit by 1 m/s, you would need to impart something like 10²² joules of energy into it. Wikipedia says that if this asteroid hits the moon, the impact energy will be around 10¹⁶ joules. I don't know how much you know about exponents, but 10¹⁶ is approximately 0% of the way to 10²², and that's just change of 1 m/s

Of course, someone who actually understands physics is free to correct me if I'm wrong

[–] commander@lemmings.world -2 points 1 day ago

Here's the upside: new species will evolve that can take better advantage of the new environment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›