this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
95 points (92.8% liked)

Fediverse

30326 readers
1176 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I absolutely believe the Fediverse needs to remain a space built on transparency, autonomy, and equity for users, instance admins, and developers working on ActivityPub. Look at the current state of social media, power and money concentrated in the hands of a few, stifling innovation and undermining trust. The centralized model isn’t just flawed, I think it’s had a devastating impact on an entire generation.

The Fediverse offers us a chance to rethink how the internet should work. It’s not just about being a space for free expression; it’s also about proving that a values-driven model can support those who keep the lights on. My main question is, can we implement monetization that honors our commitment to fairness, transparency, and equity, while still ensuring that the people supporting the network earn a livable wage?

This isn’t about getting rich, it’s about creating a sustainable ecosystem that empowers us all to build and maintain a trustworthy digital space. The Fediverse is already a success in its own right, but to truly evolve and thrive, I would argue we need a resource model that can drive sustainable innovation and meaningful progress.

TL;DR: I’d quit my day job tomorrow if I could secure a living wage from this work. Many in tech whold do the same. Is a monetization model that fairly compensates those who support and sustain the Fediverse possible?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 11 points 17 hours ago

There are a few ways to monetise the Fediverse.

  • Donations - to devs and those running the instances. Lemmy gets enough from donations and grants to have a couple of full-time devs but it still doesn't pay a lot. dansup using Kickstarter is proving interesting. Donations to your instance works well and a lot of places that offer this bring in enough to cover hosting costs but not much more. Open Collective has proved very good in this regard.
  • Classified ads - !flohmarkt@lemmy.ca does a decent job of bringing buyers and sellers together.
  • Subscription newsletters/blogs - Ghost is moving into the same space as Substack but with federation, so should do well.

So you wouldn't be able to give up the day job by running an instance but you might if you were the lead devs of a popular service or if you had a thriving following on Ghost.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t see why the Fediverse can’t be run as non-profit and by volunteers. We are 8 billion people on this planet. I’m sure we can handle it.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree. Look at email servers. It just works out. Email server owners don't look at the content. They just host the servers. Both protocols are federated.

Forums will most likely be driven by the community and volunteers. Just move everyone over to the fediverse. Then it should be easier to find such people.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But do you remember how they monetized email

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the largest email company is probably Google (maybe Microsoft). Google definitely looks at every email they receive for users!

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don't use Gmail. There are plenty of email providers out there that is completely free without ads and privacy focused. Mailfence, Tutanota, ProtonMail etc. Personally I use my ISP provider that is actually pro privacy - Bahnhof . That due it is a niche and if you don't save logs you don't have the log storage cost.

If feddit.nu (only 50 users) did not exist I would have chosen to self-host it on the free Oracle VPS teir.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The claim was "Email server owners don't look at the content". This is untrue since possibly the largest owner of email servers looks at the content to monetize the service. That's all.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 1 points 8 hours ago

They are not suppose to do that. It is disrespect to the user privacy. Hence good opportunity to change owner. Just a design flaw of the protocol that makes it possible to abuse that. Gmail is just one single provider, but yes, many more does it and Gmail is big.

[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Monetizing is what ruins other places.

I like the way my home instance does financial backing through an open model, and that's part of why I chose it.

An ideal is enough contributors to keep the lights on and to reimburse the admins for their time spent in keeping it afloat. Moderation should always be a volunteer position for those that want to support their individual communities.

Any excesses in finance I would hope go towards future running costs (to a point), feature development and then charitable donations in that order. Non-profit on paper and in practice.

This is viable for a small instance. Maybe even larger ones if the users are altruistic enough as a whole.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

That's pretty cool, I didn't know that about lemmy.zip

[–] Ziggurat@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First question, why would we want monetization? people do amateur theatre, short movies for fun, volunteer do coach kids sport for fun so the whole society doesn't have to be commercial, and even Wikipedia is mostly ran by volunteers.

I mean sure, federated instance and some authors may get government grant for culture (which would be better spend than for commercial movies, or all the government money spent in AI) but not monetizing won't prevent people from contributing

[–] False@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Servers and bandwidth can be expensive yo

[–] splendoruranium@infosec.pub 1 points 17 hours ago

Servers and bandwidth can be expensive yo

Doesn't that just mean federation instance maintainers are self-selected among those members of the community who can afford them in the first place? It's just a less distributed form of a donation system. Instead of relying on 50 people making a 1$ donation each to pay a 50$ hosting bill, you rely on one person (the maintainer of the instance) making a single 50$ donation. That the maintainer wants to donate is already established, how much they can afford to donate can always be reflected by how much they're willing to let their instance grow.
That doesn't bode well for the longevity of any single instance, but I've always assumed the general idea was to have as many small instances as possible anyway instead of few big ones, otherwise what's the point of federation. And if you avoid big instances then there will never be a need to funnel funds into big hosting bills.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Unsubstantiated claim: Any set of rules that aim at distributing money according to some merit can be exploited in a way that those who get the most money are not those providing the most value.

Or less formally: Any game can be cheesed.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

Well there was sub.club but it died.

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Instances could run stake pools and tie the two together somehow. Perhaps in this case, your username follows whatever pool you're staking to.

It's a solution look for a problem admittedly. It works better in the case that instances act as retail "clubs" like Costco for example. In that case, stakers to said pool could be authorized to get certain deals on products sold by that instance.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

First sign of crypto and I am out. I would speculate that is true of a lot of people in the Fediverse.

From my perspective, there are only two use cases for crypto 1. Criminal activity 2. Pump and dumps

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

Yeah! How dare people try to have wealth that is actually borderless and self-sovereign. Those idiots are scammers! I will own nothing and be happy. Get out of my way, I need to step in line to bow before the Federal reserve (an organization that I fully admit is corrupt to the core and the very root of the issues in our society). I'm actually a Marxist living in a capitalist society. So, I am too cool to worry about the fact that I actually need money. I'll just pretend that I don't need it even though I REALLY do. I'll do whatever I can to piss on viable alternatives to the Fed just because people were degenerate gamblers and got owned by obvious scammers. Sure the fed can take away my money for no reason, inflate the dollar so that my savings are worth less every single day, and do whatever they feel like with my money but that is a good thing because scammers exist in the world....

sarcasm/s

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Crazy idea here: would it be possible to have a model where everyone's phone is a mini personal instance, syncing with others when the user opens the app? When a phone is offline that phones content would be unavailable too, but that is part of the truly decentralised model.

[–] cralder@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

That would drain your battery pretty quickly since it would need to be communicating with other instances constantly

[–] shootwhatsmyname@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would love to see an optional monthly subscription to Lemmy where funds are automatically distributed based on how you used Lemmy that month. There would have to be a lot of research on how to avoid exploitation, but Open Collective might have some good examples of how to securely handle funds like that

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

I would love this, great idea

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Something along the lines of a monthly donation model, perhaps with a nominal "pro" system. A badge to showing that you donate and how many years you've been donating (users can disable display of such badges if they want).

[–] knightmare1147@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I second something like this, don't make it compulsory but instead something people want to spend money to support.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Great idea. Backed by some kind of Patreon for FOSS. Which might exist already, as I just learned here: Open Collective

[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Truly fair would be to have corporations pay.the users to allow them to show them advertisements.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A corporation will only pay users to watch ads if it is a way to get them to buy junk that they didn't need or possibly even want. Otherwise the model breaks. Advertising is a scourge, to rely on it in any way does not feel "values-driven" to me.

PS: to be clear, maybe the ad model has merits on pragmatic grounds but, speaking personally, if I ever see an ad here, I am GONE and never coming back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schmeeds@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I mean honestly, why not? If a server admin chargers a $1 per ad the user should get $0.50. Crude example but you get the idea.

[–] sonalder@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look at what nostr community is doing with zaps, I think it's cool

[–] tocano 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

isn't nostr overrun with cryptobros?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've been wondering if there's an opportunity for instance admins (e.g. lemmy.world) to offer managed instances for user domains.

It would be great if it was easier for the average person to own a domain and use it for email, matrix, Lemmy, etc.

[–] Bali@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You mean a bit like WordPress.com model?

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago

Possibly, but I'm not very familiar with wordpress.

I imagined something like:

https://nextcloud.com/partners/

The idea is that I could pay someone to admin the same services that they provide to the public.

So like maybe lemmy.world and the other popular instances could offer a Lemmy instance, and maybe also offer: matrix, pixelfed, mastodon, etc etc.

There are decent options out there for mainstream services like email, web, etc. but maybe not for more niche services like lemmy.

[–] False@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Realistically no

Still learning about the fediverse, but... What about a simple percentage system so you can donate whatever you want. A large portion goes to the instance that you register with and smaller portions go to Lemmy programmers. Maybe portions can be set aside for parts of the fediverse that we all use like gif/video hosting. I'd say make the percentages the same across the fediverse so people know what goes where.

Personally I'd prefer monthly giving like patreon.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

I think keep it donation based. Perhaps do a Lemmy gold where u can donate to boost a comment/post and said donation is split between content creator community instance etc.

load more comments
view more: next ›