Their original staff was a bunch of pretty serious journalists sourced from the BBC.
Si on juge comme ça, il n'y a pas un seul journal français crédible. Ils appartiennent tous aux milliardaires. Sauf que, de fait, on y trouve toujours du bon journalisme car la structure de propriété n'est pas la seule critère pour juger la crédibilité.
En l'occurrence le WaPo reste très sérieux comme source.
Similar to: chough
It's a type of bird but good luck knowing how to pronounce it. Ahh, English.
A few years ago I considered learning Greek. Abandoned the plan because Greek has the triple whammy:
So: good luck.
Rigth - and downvotes fixes it? This is lunacy and detrimental to discussion/sharing.
Thank you. But anecdotally, it seems there are few of us who think this. I still don't understand why.
Really sad. Realistically, though, environmental protection will always come second to human development. To stop human-wildllife conflict, the only solution is poverty alleviation, healthcare, education. India's progress here is too slow but it's definitely happening.
Ça avance, ça avance.
Everyone who cares about privacy needs to have a response to this fallacy practiced and ready to go. The aim should be to convince skeptics that they too already have "things to hide", or at least that they might show a bit of solidarity with the good guys who do.
Rhetorical questions can that be effective:
The last argument is the really powerful one, but unfortunately it's pretty hard to pull off.
Ce que tu es en train d'avancer, je suppose, derrière ce discours sur la statistique, c'est la théorie comme quoi la pollution parisienne vient non pas des bagnoles mais des autres sources diverses et variées. OK. Est-ce que tu es conducteur par hasard ?
Un lien peut être corrélation comme causation, tu vas bien le savoir.
Exactly my point. The virtual equivalent of taping someone's mouth shut because you happen not to agree with what they say.