255
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by merthyr1831@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

TLDR: XFCE and Cinnamon devs are ~~begging~~ beginning to work on Wayland support.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 8 months ago

The "TLDR" is sub heading is completely misleading. Cinnamon devs see they have to move, that's the reason. "Begging to work" on Wayland is not at all what the article says. Before you downvote, read it. Nothing in that article or the link to one dev's blog says anything even remotely like that.

[-] oneiros@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 8 months ago

I suspect it's just an autocorrect typo for "beginning to work".

[-] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 8 months ago

I like that... I'll take it. Thank you for putting it that way.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Beginning* yep sorry!

[-] halfempty@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

As a Debian XFCE user, I will gladly switch to Wayland when it is available.

[-] mhz@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Why not just install the Cinnamon desktop when it becomes wayland ready?

[-] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 9 points 8 months ago

XFCE wants to be Wayland ready with XFCE 4.20, which should be released near the end of 2024. Cinnamon wants to have Wayland as default by 2026. So, in theory at least, XFCE should be Wayland-ready before Cinnamon.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Good. X11 has not been properly maintained and shouldn’t be the default for any distro. (Xorg, whatever.)

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] dojan@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

I feel like talk about Wayland being the next big thing, “coming soon” began back when I was using Linux as my daily driver over ten years ago.

It’s still not widely used?

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

It’s the default in most big distros, so it is widely used.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

the usual exception is nvidia, a lot of distros fall back to X on nvidia

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Not sure if that'll stay much longer, either. I'm using using dual graphics with nVidia and Wayland on KDE works just fine. The only annoyance is that KDE doesn't have very good touchpad gestures by default, but you also can't modify them. Boo!

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's extremely widely used. It's been the Gnome default (unless you used Nvidia) since 2016 or something.

Even in Debian on Gnome it's been the default since 2019.

On KDE a bunch of distros use it too.

Wayland is the future. But for most it's already the present too.

[-] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Nvidia has been decent on Wayland from my experience. Then again my experience has just been 5 days, but it feels snappier than X11 I kinda like the feel.

[-] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Nvidia on Wayland is usable but not much more than that. There are issues with Xwayland windows flickering and some general instabilities and glitches. But it works for the most part, and the 545 drivers supposedly fix lots of missing features and bugs for Wayland.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] YaBoyMax@programming.dev 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's a very slow moving project by design for better or for worse. There also hasn't been a ton of developer interest in the DE space in supporting it until the last few years since it would necessarily take resources away from other work, and generally X has been "good enough" until recently. I don't have anything to back this up but I suspect that the increased accessibility of gaming on Linux as well as HRR and HDR displays entering the mainstream had a lot to do with this renewed interest.

[-] SuperIce@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

I've been using Wayland for about 8 years at this point. Some people (especially in the Linux world) are just really against change.

[-] db2@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago

It's still got issues even now, but back then they were big enough that you had to really want to use it, casual users would have become quickly frustrated.

Also Steam.

[-] mhz@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

"Coming soon" for me started when major DEs started abandoning xorg, not when they adopted wayland.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 16 points 8 months ago

Keep in mind their time line is like 2 years.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] flamingos@feddit.uk 12 points 8 months ago

devs are begging

Do you mean beginning?

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

OP: "did I fucking stutter?!"

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Yup! my bad!

[-] db2@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago

It could be begging if they're not the ones in control of the steering.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The creators of Linux Mint and the Cinnamon desktop are experimenting with the Wayland protocol – and so is the original developer of Xfce.

Normally, the project's experimental repository, codenamed "Romeo," is private, and code is only opened to the public once it reaches beta test stage.

Cinnamon 6.0, planned for Mint 21.3 this year, will feature experimental Wayland support, but he warns folks not to expect too much at this early stage:

It was the first release that defaulted to the then-new Unity desktop, and at the time, the Reg didn't rate it very highly.

As his new blog reveals, so is Red Hat developer Olivier Fourdan, who has been working on a rootful mode for XWayland.

What is possibly more interesting is that Monsieur Fourdan has a previous claim to fame: he is the original author of the Xfce desktop, which he started building way back in 1996, as he mentions in this 2009 interview.


The original article contains 484 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

How did Mint fuck up year-based version numbering? I did a fresh install on a laptop this year and briefly worried project had died.

[-] ayaya@lemdro.id 17 points 8 months ago

It's not actually based on the year. There have been 21 other major releases at various intervals starting with 1.0 in 2006. It just happens to be close to the current year right now.

[-] ideonella@lemmy.one 4 points 8 months ago

Wayland has been great on Debian stable after swapping to an AMD graphics card

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I've had good experiences with Wayland on nVidia too. KDE has a rock solid Wayland implementation.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
255 points (96.7% liked)

Linux

45530 readers
1471 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS