this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
1281 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

63614 readers
2901 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Firefox maker Mozilla deleted a promise to never sell its users' personal data and is trying to assure worried users that its approach to privacy hasn't fundamentally changed. Until recently, a Firefox FAQ promised that the browser maker never has and never will sell its users' personal data. An archived version from January 30 says:

Does Firefox sell your personal data?

Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That's a promise.

That promise is removed from the current version. There's also a notable change in a data privacy FAQ that used to say, "Mozilla doesn't sell data about you, and we don't buy data about you."

The data privacy FAQ now explains that Mozilla is no longer making blanket promises about not selling data because some legal jurisdictions define "sale" in a very broad way:

Mozilla doesn't sell data about you (in the way that most people think about "selling data"), and we don't buy data about you. Since we strive for transparency, and the LEGAL definition of "sale of data" is extremely broad in some places, we've had to step back from making the definitive statements you know and love. We still put a lot of work into making sure that the data that we share with our partners (which we need to do to make Firefox commercially viable) is stripped of any identifying information, or shared only in the aggregate, or is put through our privacy preserving technologies (like OHTTP).

Mozilla didn't say which legal jurisdictions have these broad definitions.

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

my other comment is here about the acting CEO of Mozilla, Laura Chambers, and asking about potential connections to Musk and Thiel.

https://lemmy.world/comment/15382904

I just got an alert that I need to update my FF browser before March 14th. that's another date that keeps coming up.

March 14th is the

  • date of the next government shutdown due to budget negotiations
  • 53 days after trump took office (same amount of days it took Hitler to destroy German democracy before WW2
  • date that a major root certificate ends on(what once was) one of the most privacy focused browsers that will break existing add-ons and potentially break/expose you online
  • date of a total lunar eclipse (it perfectly frames the US in the middle, serious go look it up)

don't forget that the ides of march is march 15th, as well as March is named after Mars the God of War.

I'm no mystic, but symbolism is important to megalomaniacs.

anyone else know of other important technological or political events happening on March 14th?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Anyone recommend an iOS alternative?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

You can always install a ~~fork~~ different browser

https://mullvad.net/en/browser

~~librewolf.net~~

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I have been advised it's not a fork but a reconfig of default firefox, therefore it would technically be subject to the same ToS.

Edit: here's where I got that (with a link to the cfg) https://lemmy.world/comment/15368938

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Depending on how the requirement to accept the ToS is implemented, a config file might be able to disable it and any features that depend on it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Ah, thanks for the clarification. I was under the impression it didn't call out to mozilla servers if you didn't enable sync.

I guess Mullvad would be the next popular browser yeah?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

afaict Mullvad browser doesn't support plugins which - it does some adblock by default (more ifyou have the VPN) and so on but i gots to have my DarkViewer so it's a sometimes browser for me atm.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm using Fennec (based on Firefox, sans telemetry). Is there a good, reliable, and trustable way to export my bookmarks so I don't have to depend on Firefox Sync?

Edit: forgot to say: on Android.

I use Floccus cause it syncs to nextcloud bookmarks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I realized mozilla is cooked a few months ago when i read this issue where it has taken them TWELVE YEARS to implement a date picker

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=888320

[–] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

They have also had this issue open for 20 years.

And this amounts to just allowing the user to specify a different directory for Firefox on Linux (~/.mozilla is terrible).

Frankly unacceptable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›