this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
370 points (98.9% liked)

World News

42513 readers
3259 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump defended Russia's massive missile and drone attack on Ukraine that followed his administration's halt to intelligence sharing and military aid to Kyiv, saying Putin was "doing what anybody would do."

Trump told reporters he finds it "easier" to work with Russia than Ukraine, claiming Putin "wants to end the war."

While threatening vague sanctions against Russia on social media, Trump's actual actions have targeted Ukraine, including cutting off military supplies and disabling Ukraine's access to satellite imagery.

Ukrainian forces have reportedly suffered battlefield setbacks as a direct result of these U.S. policy changes.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

So he knew civilians would be killed by his actions and let it happen without any concern.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

"... with the intel that we gave to them."

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 57 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Siding with the Russians.

Good God, America.

Look at yourself, FFS!

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 1 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Wow! These guys are so blinded by their love of privilidge.

Trust me, you’d rather be a Dem.

Fucking clueless.

[–] baratheon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

letting friends die for his proffit. hope he likes the smell of blood on his hands

[–] schema@lemmy.world 25 points 17 hours ago

Someone should ask him what he would do if Russia took Alaska.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 61 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Okay let's game this out then. If you had a president who is stomping on your civil rights, tearing down the safety net, and crashing your economy - what is it that 'anyone would do'?

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 50 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Play Nintendo. I like the character that wears green

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Luigi

Weegee

Green Mario

L U I G I fucking M a n GiO N E

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 20 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[–] commander@lemmings.world -1 points 7 hours ago

Oof.

Glad I left that instance. Mods need to grow some spines and stop censoring things just because people complain.

We already have the tools to ignore others.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago
[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 9 points 19 hours ago

Player 2 has entered the chat.

[–] otto@sh.itjust.works 131 points 1 day ago
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 33 points 21 hours ago

So another way to read this is Trump admitting that he wants to invade Ukraine?

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 82 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't do that.

Literally viewing the world like a EU4 map painting player would

[–] Oomny@lemmy.ca 15 points 23 hours ago

Sure....it's what anyone would do to defeat their enemies.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Lol I like to toot that trump should deal with all these illegal immigrants by offering state hood to their countries but he won't. Why? Color scale.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Good luck dealing with a Mexican insurgency.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

I would heartily support one.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

mexico??? you know the panama/canada/greenland talk yeah.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's been a long standing right wing fantasy of sending the us military to deal with the cartels

[–] commander@lemmings.world -3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

What about that is right-wing?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 2 minutes ago (1 children)

When your response to complicated situation that could be solved with non-violence is to send in the military - that's right wing

[–] commander@lemmings.world 1 points 1 minute ago

How do we solve it with non-violence?