this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
182 points (98.9% liked)

World News

43508 readers
3938 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The pollution of the planet by microplastics is significantly cutting food supplies by damaging the ability of plants to photosynthesise, according to a new assessment.

The analysis estimates that between 4% and 14% of the world’s staple crops of wheat, rice and maize is being lost due to the pervasive particles. It could get even worse, the scientists said, as more microplastics pour into the environment.

About 700 million people were affected by hunger in 2022. The researchers estimated that microplastic pollution could increase the number at risk of starvation by another 400 million in the next two decades, calling that an “alarming scenario” for global food security.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ha, that's way worse than I would have expected the damage of micro plastics to cause.

Cancer? Psh. Male infertility? Psh. Those aren't things that will threaten the species, unless all men go sterile.

But interfering with photosynthesis? That's really bad

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Who would have thought that releasing trillions and trillions of tiny toxic pollutants into the biosphere would have negative consequences.

I mean, probably some executive at shell or BP, but clearly executives have some kind of mental disorder that prevents them from anticipating anything further out than 3 months in the future.

[–] Endmaker@ani.social 24 points 1 day ago
[–] Phytobus@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

doesnt it also mimic estrogen-like hormones, and promote certain cancers too.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Yo, Children of Men where all the dudes are shooting plastic pellets let's go

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fewer people makes for less plastic.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Problem is that the plastic is already around. In fact, less people will have to deal with more plastic than they'd ever been responsible for

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Not for long.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Horrors beyond comprehension... yes... perfect.

[–] hsakaa@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago

"study finds"

You mean that it wasn't observable before? Yeah, I am gonna call it sensationalist nonsense

[–] pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

I'd be dead by that time...