this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
354 points (87.2% liked)

/0 Governance

186 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

FINAL UPDATE

@bdonvr, admin of The Lemmy Club has, in my opinion, responded in good faith to the concerns raised in this post, and so I have withdrawn my proposal for defederation. In summary:

  1. They will no longer be allowing conservative/right wing communities on their instance
  2. A couple of accounts were banned ( marathon and Bernard )
  3. "realcaseyrollins decided to voluntarily close /c/news@thelemmy.club, /c/censorshipnews@thelemmy.club, and /c/opeds@thelemmy.club."

Personally, I think this is just about the ideal outcome, and I hope this will convince folks to give The Lemmy Club another chance.


The Lemmy Club is currently suffering from "The Nazi Bar" problem. All of their top communities are run by three right-wingers as illustrated below.

The Lemmy Club instance admin doesn't seem to want to ban them, for the reasons mentioned below:

This vote is on whether or not we should defederate from this instance until they address their Nazi Bar problem.

Upvote = for defederation. Downvote = against defederation.

Edit: As others have mentioned, happy to treat this a only a temporary measure until the problem is resolved.

Edit 2: The Lemmy Club admin has said they will implement a rule against right wing communities, and has taken action on some problematic posts and users (see original comments below).

I'm willing to extend the benefit of the doubt to the admin here, as they have responded in good faith:

If you implement those changes then I’d be willing to withdraw the defederation proposal and consider the problem resolved.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Defederation means censorship. If I, as an individual, have a problem with communities, I can block them. I like to keep that choice under my own control. So I vote for: No Defederation.

[–] nargis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pro temporary defederation. They seem to have removed the 'Right Wing Videos' community, though?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I vote to defederate since this is a big problem but we also could simply remove all affected communities and ban the right wingers who control those communities. Though I can understand why defederation is warranted and also desired in this case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SoftQuartz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

no need to repeat reddit's mistakes

im sure any community they have that is worth being connected could be remade here right?

im pretty new here and came from reddit as im tired of dealing with right wing assholes

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

eh havent personally noticed them. sounds like a local instance problem. not down playing the nazi bar problem but dont see the need to ban the instance atm.

[–] sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't agree with defederation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wobble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

-- edited to clarify the mob rule comment

I really appreciate the discussion, this will be my wordy take.

I am actively against needing to selectively ban individual communities. This may open up to a form of 'policing', or encouraging hunter-seekers and dogged flag raisers. It is lazy administration to ask another instance to moderate on your behalf, lets not go there.

Defederation, whilst the nuclear option, could be seen as seeking some form of regime change or that spooky governance from a distance. If this appears more and more in need of attention, disproportionate to overall growth, we may need to have a different discussion. That said, it is the purpose and power of a federation.

Are there any ways we can deduce if 'actors' are going out there and polluting other instances intentionally? Reddit bot farms come to mind. Can we see if other trusted instances feel the same?

Finally, I would hope this doesnt become some sort of (likely well intended) mob rule as a consequence of the above. We must have clear rules on how and when, what tips the scales, as this could become a trigger happy habit.

Maintaining a new community without prior experience may be tough, so supporting other instances might be all that is needed.

Concerns must be communicated - with evidence - and shown how they go against our rules/conduct/ethos whatever. Seek clarification from the admins if any actions or steps will be taken. If nothing changes after a period of time then defederation is the way to go. A notice board of some sort communicating this publically with the what has been done taken above and hopefully see organic change in the future.

Do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›