this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
205 points (88.4% liked)

World News

44442 readers
2795 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The tool, which is able to cut lines at depths of up to 4,000 metres (13,123 feet) – twice the maximum operational range of existing subsea communication infrastructure – has been designed specifically for integration with China’s advanced crewed and uncrewed submersibles like the Fendouzhe, or Striver, and the Haidou series.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 27 points 5 hours ago

No shit, lol. Those cunts have been cutting cables for almost a year now. This is why countries tend to hide the exact locations of cables. Shit is expensive.

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Reset the world order by sending everybody including China back to stone age right? That’d be fun.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If I had that type of technology I would not advertise it

[–] Kabriste@lemm.ee 8 points 7 hours ago

For me it's quite the opposite. It's all about power projection in the grand scheme of things.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 34 points 10 hours ago

Powerful seems like a pointless adjective here.

It doesn't take much power to destroy a cable. Did they invent a really long, and powerful, chain with a powerful anchor on it only usable by a boat with powerful electric winch?

Maybe they put AI in it too, for extra power of course

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 58 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"That could reset the world order"

Lmao, what hyperbolic bullshit. It's just a cable cutter. Most nations have shit like this, but thanks for letting us know in the title this is just Chinese propaganda.

[–] josefo@leminal.space 1 points 9 minutes ago

It will shift the orders from cables to starlink. Not the best idea tho, it sucks ass

[–] NotLemming@lemm.ee 27 points 16 hours ago

Let me guess, they already tested it

[–] az04@lemmy.world 28 points 17 hours ago

This could have been a The Onion title

[–] DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee 115 points 21 hours ago (29 children)

That country fucking sucks ass.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 51 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It's give and take. China is smart enough to invest in its country and its people. They're making great scientific and technical advances that's on a course that will surpass the west in many areas. The individual rights and freedoms are terrible though to the point where unsanctioned creativity is punished.

[–] DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee 44 points 17 hours ago

The whole country is dystopian. But agree there are smart people. They are just used for doing/inventing awful stuff.

They are playing the long game and are currently the only ones benefiting from all that happens. They sit by idly watching our idiot leaders antagonise each other.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao people will say this same shit about the us in 8 years when all the rights have been stripped and it’s run by tech bros

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 29 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. In many ways, China is exactly what Republicans wet dream about. A single party runs unopposed controlling all elements of government. Criticizing them is illegal. All businesses are protected by the government from uppity customers. Employees are expected to work 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 6 days a week for few benefits with almost no workers rights..

It's the Republican dream.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zaxvenz@lemm.ee 32 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 12 hours ago

That seems less concerning to me after reading the article.

Russia and the US are also known to conduct proximity operations to their own and other satellites, she added.
[…]
Referring to China’s operations as “dogfighting” in space is “not helpful” because it “automatically ascribes hostile intentions to activities that frankly the US also undertakes,” Samson added.

It’s concerning that they are developing the capability (which can be used in multiple ways) in the same way that any geopolitical rival developing capacity that competes is concerning, but “dogfighting” evokes the idea that China is planning to fly around and blow stuff up, in an irresponsible, Kessler syndrome-inducing way.

[–] DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee 15 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (10 children)

That country fucking sucks major ass. Space lasers when?

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 12 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

We literally have starlink and the US run by fascists with nukes. I don't mind seeing other countries that they threaten ready to combat their information systems.

[–] DicksAndPizza@lemm.ee 26 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah, but that’s only as long as they target the US with their bullshit. Dictatorships don’t exactly have a history of stopping after „defeating“ their enemy. They’ll find new ones (spoiler it’s gonna be Europe).

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Is this like how they targeted African countries economies with the Belt and Road Initiative?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 13 points 16 hours ago (3 children)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Don’t worry, they’re working on satellite warfare too. Kessler syndrome, here we come

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Working on the thing we've had for half a century? Improving sure but thaad and kenetic kill devices have been around forever like South Korea just showed video of their testing which means it's almost certainly last gen and the new Gen is deployed.

https://youtu.be/RnofCyaWhI0

https://youtu.be/DfiAPx0rPXg

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I sincerely hope they’re smart enough not to trigger that.

Someone posted an article elsewhere on the thread about China practicing “dogfighting” in space - which, after you remove the fear-mongering, is just them figuring out how to do satellite-satellite maneuvering. Still immense opportunity for runaway collisions, but it seems like the military applicability is more toward sabotage than blowing things up. I could definitely see a scenario where high value satellites have had small boosters affixed to them, their electronics tampered, or some other way of commandeering or de-orbiting them to deprive their owners of them. A microwave + laser could disable smaller sats from above, then ablate some of their exterior to sap momentum so gravity drops them in short order. (Maybe. That’s idle speculation, but generating the power and dissipating the heat in space could make that idea impossible.)

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yeah, the only feasible way to do satellite warfare without creating a ton of debris is to mechanically attach to an enemy satellite and drop it out of orbit.

Like imagine an autonomous attacker satellite that clamps onto the target satellite, and uses thrusters to drop itself (and the target) into the ocean. Any kind of kinetic weaponry to destroy the target satellite will just end up with a debris cloud around the earth, making future space travel impossible.

But no country wants to invest in satellites just to intentionally drop them out of orbit. Every single attack would be prohibitively expensive when compared to just firing a missile at the satellite.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Weird way to pronounce starlink, since it seems that’s what they’re hoping for. Privatizing the government

[–] rudi@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 14 hours ago

Seriously.. Anything but Starlink

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 37 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

...as reported by the South China Morning Post lol

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 13 points 18 hours ago

Historically they were a solid paper, based out of Hong Kong. It’s a toss up these days though, not sure.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Fucker McGucker, this is evil

load more comments
view more: next ›