this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
140 points (97.3% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3391 readers
2 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

by PythonMaps

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I heard you saying the Mercator projection didn't deformed the earth enough and made thisbfor you.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 11 months ago

I mean, they all have to deform something, mathematically speaking. Usually Antarctica is not picked as the least deformed area, though.

I wonder if this would be better centered around the north pole. I guess a normal non-polar projection would do the job too, since we're very familiar with them and the fact they wrap around.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What is causing the data artifact at the International Date Line?

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 14 points 11 months ago

I was wondering the same thing. My best guess is that the data for typhoons and hurricanes come from different databases.

[–] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Standard east pole counter-magnetic influence in the surface normal vector plane.

(sips tea)

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

Ah, so an effect of the time cube?

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For some reason, this projection is just really messing with me. I can recognize, with a bit of effort, the continents, but their relative sizes and positions is just making it tough to really follow what I’m guessing is an argument on storm patterns.

Can I suggest pushing out a visualization that uses an interactive 3d globe model instead of a single jpg? I feel like if I could scroll up and down between a normal sized Antarctica and a normal sized North America, my brain would be less confused as far as interpreting patterns and interactions goes.

[–] Tomassci@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If it helps you, the hurricane belts do have the equator nicely between them.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago

Oh damn, that's the equator. It looks so non-centric here I didn't even recognise it.

[–] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would've liked country lines, I have no clue what I'm looking at from this angle of the globe

[–] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 20 points 11 months ago

It's centred on Antartica. The prime meridian is up and the International Date Line is down.

[–] ma11ie@lemmy.one 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Omitting Hurricane Catarina - the only hurricane on record in the South Atlantic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Catarina

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I was wondering why South America and Atlantic southern Africa lucked out so much.

Typically, tropical cyclones do not form in the South Atlantic Ocean, due to strong upper-level shear, cool water temperatures, and the lack of a convergence zone of convection.

Now I'm going to go down a rabbit hole about why it's cold, I guess.

[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Another in my long list of reasons to live in Bali.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They spawn from Oz or head towards?

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Where else do dangerous thing come from?